1065 _Dubhtach Albannach prim anmchara Erinn acus Albain_ in Ardmacha quievit.—_Ib._ Footnote 674: 1070 _Abbas Ia_, id est, _Mac mic Baetan domarbhadh do mac ind Ab._ (slain by the son of the abbot) _hua Maeldoradh_.—_Ib._ Footnote 675: Inter cætera bona quæ nobilis hera fecerat, Huense cœnobium, quod servus Christi Columba tempore Brudei regis Pictorum filii Meilocon, construxerat, sed tempestate præliorum cum longa vetustate dirutum fuerat, fidelis regina reædificavit, datisque sumptibus idoneis ad opus Domini monachis reparavit.—_Orderic. Vital._, B. viii. c. 22. Footnote 676: _Magnus Saga, Collect. de Rebus Alb._, p. 348. Footnote 677: 1099 _Donnchadh mac mic Moenaig Ab._ Ia in pace pausavit.—_An. Ult._ The form of Mac mic, which appears in the names of the two last abbots of Iona instead of the Irish form _hua_, rather indicates that these two abbots were Scotchmen. Footnote 678: 1093 _Fothadh Ardepscop Albain_ in Christo quievit.—_An. Ult._ The legend of St. Andrew says, speaking of the title Episcopus Scottorum, ‘Sic quippe ab antiquo episcopi Sancti Andreæ dicti sunt et in scriptis tam antiquis quam modernis invenientur dicti Summi Archiepiscopi sive Summi episcopi Scotorum, Unde et conscribi fecit in theca Evangelii Fothet episcopus, maxime vir authoritatis, versus istos— ‘Hanc Evangelii thecam construxit aviti Fothet qui Scotis Summus Episcopus est.’ Bower altered the expression ‘Summus Episcopus’ to ‘Primus Episcopus,’ and applied it to the first Fothad, whom he made first bishop, though in the revised edition of the _Scotichronicon_ in the Cupar MS., he corrects his mistake. Wyntoun takes the same view, but ‘Summus Episcopus’ is the exact equivalent in Latin of the Irish _Ard epscop_, and there is no doubt that the last Fothad is the bishop meant. The Gospel he so carefully protected may have been a gift from Queen Margaret. Footnote 679: _Regist. Prior. S. Andreæ_, p. 115. Footnote 680: _Chron. Picts and Scots_, p. 188. See also Dr. Reeves’s _British Culdees_, p. 106, and the very valuable commentary in the notes. Footnote 681: Dr. Reeves was the first to give the correct explanation of this passage in the legend. See _British Culdees_, p. 107, note. Footnote 682: Dr. Reeves on the _British Culdees_, p. 75. Footnote 683: Dr. Reeves on the _Ancient Churches of Armagh_, p. 21. Footnote 684: See _infra_, p. 414, note 780, for original of this passage. Footnote 685: _Miscellany of the Irish Archæological Society_, vol. i. p. 131. Footnote 686: _Ib._ p. 133. Footnote 687: _Ib._ p. 141. Footnote 688: _Miscellany of the Irish Archæological Society_, vol. i. p. 129. Footnote 689: _Ib._, p. 131. Footnote 690: _Ib._, p. 129.