Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and peopleSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The acquisition of part of the tribe land as the absolute property of
individuals, and their advance as wealthy land as well as cattle owners,
led to its further development. The _Aire_ who owned an estate in land
which raised him to the position of a _Flath_ or chief, and was enabled
to transmit it to his descendants, led to the settlement of his family
and kinsfolk on the land. He was not considered as fully entitled to the
privileges of a territorial lord unless his father and grandfather had
likewise been an _Aire_; and when three generations had thus been
settled on the land, the offshoots of these generations formed a group
consisting of the nearest agnates of the chief, which would increase in
number as the generations went on. These were the _Ciné_, or kinsfolk of
the head of the tribe, and to them were added those freemen of the tribe
who claimed a common origin with them, and who placed themselves under
the chief as his _Ceile_ or dependants.
[Sidenote: The _Ceile_ or tenants.]
The same causes which operated in the feudal system to lead the odal
proprietors to commend themselves to an overlord as his vassals, and
gradually extinguished the more ancient class of independent
landholders, tended likewise in the Irish tribal system to absorb the
original freemen of the tribe in the class of the _Ceile_ or dependants
of the chief, and thus to add to his following and to form a constituent
part of the _Finé_ or sept.
With the _Saor Ceile_, or free dependants, the basis was a mutual
contract for a fixed period usually of seven years, by which the _Flath_
or chief gave a portion of stock proportionate to the food-rent he was
to receive in return, and was entitled along with this to the homage of
the tenant during the subsistence of the contract, and to a certain
amount of service in the erection of a _Dun_ or fort, the reaping of his
harvest, and the _Sluaged_ or hosting; but the contract could be
terminated and the parties to it return to their original relation to
each other, either by the _Ceile_ or tenant returning the stock he had
received, or by the _Flath_ reclaiming it. A more permanent connection
was formed between him and the _Daor Ceile_ or bond tenant. Here the
_Ceile_ placed himself formally under the protection of the _Flath_ as
his permanent follower, and this relation was formed by his receiving a
certain number of _Seds_ or cows, by way of subsidy or gift from the
superior, and paying him a certain tribute termed _Sed Taurclothe_, or
returnable _Seds_, as the price of his protection. This servitude was
termed _Aicillne_, and the amount of the _Seds_ was regulated by the
Honor price. As soon as this relation was constituted, he received an
additional amount of stock in proportion to the food-rent he had to
return, in the same manner as in the case of the free _Ceile_.[194] The
real distinction probably was, that in the one case the _Ceile_ was in a
more independent position, and possessed stock of his own as well as a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account