Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and peopleSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
names are corrupted from _Sliocht Enri Caoich_, or the sept of Henry the
Blind; _Sliocht Ceallaigh_, or sept of the Kellies; _Sliocht Aodh
breac_, or sept of Hugh the Freckled; _Sliocht Briuin buidhe_, or sept
of Brian the Yellow; _Sliocht Owen mhic Cuinn_, or sept of Owen son of
Conn.[223]
Sir John Davis, in his Letter to the Earl of Salisbury, written about
the same time, gives us a very clear account of the position of these
septs in the counties of Fermanagh and Cavan. In Fermanagh he derived
his information from certain of the clerks or scholars of that country,
who knew all the septs and families and their branches, and the dignity
of one sept above another, and what families or persons were chief of
every sept, and who were next, and who were of third rank, and so forth,
till they descended to the most inferior man in all the barony.
Moreover, they took upon them to tell ‘what quantity of land every man
ought to have by the custom of their country, which is of the nature of
gavelkind, whereby, as their septs or families did multiply, their
possessions have been from time to time divided and subdivided, and
broken into so many small parcels as almost every acre of land had a
several owner, who termeth himself a lord and his portion of land his
country.’ ‘Notwithstanding, as McGuire himself had a chiefry over all
the country, and some demesne that did ever pass to him only who carried
that title, so was there a chief of every sept who had certain services,
duties, and demesnes that ever passed to the Tanist of that sept, and
never was subject to division.’ And in his return of the state of the
county of Cavan he gives the following general account:—‘In the Irish
countries, where the custom of Tanistry is not extinguished, the tenures
are everywhere alike. There is first a general chieftain of every
country or territory, which hath some demesne and some household
provisions yielded unto him by all the inhabitants under him; every sept
or surname hath a particular chieftain or Tanist, which hath likewise
his peculiar demesne and duties, and these possessions go by succession
or election, entirely without any division; but all the other lands
holden by the inferior inhabitants are partable in course of gavelkind,
wherein there is no difference made between legitimate sons and
bastards.’[224]
[Sidenote: The Tribe in Wales.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account