Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people — John Shaqi
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and peopleSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The first or mythic part of this statement corresponds with the spurious
laws of Malcolm the Second, which thus commence—‘1. King Malcolme gave
and distributed all his lands of the realm of Scotland amongst his men;
2. and reserved nathing in propertie to himselfe but the Royale dignitie
and the Mute hill in the town of Scone,’[101] and may be disregarded as
belonging to the spurious history of Scotland. Whether there ever was a
time when it could be said that the king possessed nothing but the
Moothill of Scone, and in what sense it could be said that the whole
kingdom was divided into thanages, and that the whole lands of the
kingdom once belonged to the Crown, is a question that must be
determined in the course of this inquiry; but when the old chronicler
tells us by what class of persons the Crown lands were actually
possessed, and by what species of tenure they held them, he is dealing
with matters which still existed in his own day, and the characteristics
of which he had every means of ascertaining if they were not perfectly
familiar to him, and he gives us a very distinct account of them. He
discriminates between three classes of persons as possessing these
lands. The lowest class were the _agricolæ_ or husbandmen, the actual
cultivators of the soil, who were regarded as yearly tenants, and are,
no doubt, the same class with those who are termed _bondi_ and _nativi_
in feudal charters. They were, in the eastern districts, the remains of
the old Celtic population. The class next above them consisted of the
_liberi_ and _generosi_, who held land either on lease for ten or twenty
years, or in liferent renewable for one or two lives. The former were
probably equivalent to the _liberi firmarii_ or free farmers, and the
latter to the Rentallers or kindly tenants of the feudal holdings. The
third class, who held directly of the Crown, were either _milites_ or
knights, who held a knight’s fee for military service, or _thani_, who
held a thanage, or _principes_ or magnates. And he defines a thanage to
be a portion of the land of a province held _ad feodofirmam_,[102] or in
feu-farm, the holder of which was subject in payment of an annual
‘census’ or feu-duty. By the _principes_, he probably refers either to
the Mormaers or Earls of the old Celtic earldoms, or to the position of
the great Celtic vassals in the western districts as chiefs of
clans.[103] Fordun was himself connected with the northern counties of
Kincardine and Aberdeen, where the older holdings of the thanage still
maintained their position in the greatest degree even to his own day. He
was a chaplain in the diocese of Aberdeen, and the Chartulary of that
bishopric has preserved to us a rental of the Crown lands in the reign
of Alexander the Third, which shows their extent and the nature of the
holdings. In this rental we find the lands of Aberdeen, Belhelvy,
Kintore, Fermartyn, Obyne, Glendowachy, Boyn, Munbre, and Natherdale,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account