Chantemerle : $b A romance of the Vendean WarBroster, D. K. (Dorothy Kathleen)
History
Chantemerle : $b A romance of the Vendean War
Broster, D. K. (Dorothy Kathleen)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction; France -- History -- Wars of the Vendée, 1793-1832 -- Fiction
“The minister wrote bidding him defer action till March. That was
really the end of everything. The confederates dispersed, and I, too,
could delay no longer. I started homewards. Then came my accident. I
was nursed at the _manoir_ where it happened, in the family of an old
gentleman, a M. de Saint-Gervais, who had just been sheltering La
Rouërie himself. That was why I dared not give you the name. As soon
as I was fit to travel I started again—and here I am.”
“Then where is La Rouërie now?” asked both his hearers in a breath.
“Somewhere in the heart of Brittany. He absolutely refused to seek
safety in Jersey. I understand that he left the château of La
Fosse-Hingant, near Saint Malo, at the beginning of October. If
Chalons had fallen he and his Bretons would be in Paris now; perhaps
the King would be back at the Tuileries.”
Gilbert spoke with a fire new to him, and the priest looked at him in
a contemplative silence. Yet the recital, whose beginning had been
full of promising description, had disappointingly tailed off when it
came to the real issue. Both men were conscious of this, but Louis’
attempts to extract more particulars met with small success.
“Then what,” asked the Curé at last, “do you consider to be the
result of your journey?”
“To be frank,” replied the Marquis, “nothing at all.”
But the priest did not believe him.
He was more mystified than ever. He had re-entered the room that
evening—he had paused at the door with a prayer on his lips—strung up
to a most uncomfortable pitch of expectation, prepared to see he knew
not what menacing interview going forward within. Instead of that he
had beheld Louis, his depression banished, sitting laughing on the arm
of his cousin’s chair, in amiable converse with the kinsman whom he
had (perhaps) deeply wronged, and who (perhaps) knew it. It was more
than M. des Graves could fathom. Must he accuse Louis of being,
besides a traitor, the most consummate of hypocrites? No; the most
finished acting in the world could not simulate so well. He _was_
pleased to see the Marquis back; his spirits _were_ genuine. And
Gilbert . . . what of his past bearing? M. des Graves knew the
Marquis’ power of concealing his feelings, his reserve, his mastery of
himself; but he did not credit him with adding to these gifts that of
pretending to an emotion which he did not feel. Therefore the ease
which he displayed in Louis’ presence must be real. What had happened
to him? Did he know nothing, after all? Or—blessed supposition—was
there nothing to know?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account