Character of Renaissance ArchitectureMoore, Charles Herbert
History
Character of Renaissance Architecture
Moore, Charles Herbert
Architecture, Renaissance
The scheme was clearly based on the model of St. Peter’s in Rome,
to which frequent reference is made in _Parentalia_ as having
been in the mind of the architect as he developed his idea. The dome
partakes of the character of Bramante’s design on the one hand, and
of that of Michael Angelo, as finally constructed, on the other. The
likeness to Bramante’s scheme (Fig. 23, p. 48) is in the form of the
inner shell, and its adjustment to the supporting drum. The likeness
as to adjustment is not, indeed, very close; for Wren has raised the
springing so that it is almost at the top of the drum, but he has
fortified it with a continuous abutment which, though of different
outline, has substantially the same structural effect. The likeness
to St. Peter’s is further shown in the encircling order of the inner
face of the drum, which occurs in both Bramante’s scheme and in that
of Michael Angelo. There can be little doubt that Wren had studied
Bramante’s design in Serlio’s book, and had appreciated its structural
merits. But he wished, in emulation of Michael Angelo, to make his
dome externally more imposing, and he therefore raised its springing
level as we see, and adopted from Michael Angelo’s scheme the idea of
a double dome. The external outline from the top of the drum to the
haunch of the vault is too nearly the same as the corresponding part of
Michael Angelo’s design to be considered as an accidental coincidence.
The structural difference between the two is indeed great, since the
concave portion in Wren’s design is a continuous ring, while in that
of Michael Angelo it is an isolated and insignificant abutment. Wren’s
scheme is thus superior in point of constructive merit, since it
provides continuous resistance to continuous thrust. It will be seen
that the two shells of Wren’s projected dome correspond to the inner
and outer shells of Michael Angelo’s model (Fig. 26, p. 54), and thus
in reproducing the main idea of this model Wren merely omitted the
middle shell. He thus gave a wider divergence to the two vaults as they
rise than occurs in the actual dome of St. Peter’s. He also omitted the
well which in St. Peter’s connects the two shells at the crown.
A single order of pilasters adorns both the interior and the exterior
of the church itself, the one on the outside being raised on a high
basement and crowned with a plain attic; and a portico in the form of a
temple front, with its order raised on high pedestals, gives emphasis
to the west façade.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account