Character of Renaissance ArchitectureMoore, Charles Herbert
History
Character of Renaissance Architecture
Moore, Charles Herbert
Architecture, Renaissance
Renaissance architecture, in England, 216–246 (cuts);
Elizabethan art, 216–225 (cuts);
its best features were of native growth out of the mediæval
feudal castle and the latest phase of perpendicular Gothic,
216, 225;
use of classic details, 217, 218–225 (cuts);
flimsiness of material in interiors and ornamental details,
217, 218;
buildings have little foreign character in plan and outline,
but neo-classic forms are confined to ornamentation, 218,
221;
strange aberrations of design wrought by foreigners and native
craftsmen, 218–225 (cuts);
fantastic gables features of the more showy architecture, 220;
Flemish and Dutch ornamental workers, 220, 224;
the design and execution of the buildings were performed by
building craftsmen, 224, 225.
Work of Jones and Wren, 226–246 (plate and cuts);
use of classic details becoming established, 226, 228;
acceptance of neo-classic style by the people, 228, 232, 233.
Renaissance architecture, Florentine; church architecture, 26–43
(cuts);
palace architecture, 102–111 (cuts and plate).
_See_ also Renaissance architecture and Florence.
Renaissance architecture, in France, early, 179–193 (cuts);
the French Renaissance château, conditions which gave rise to,
180;
evolved from the feudal castle of the Middle Ages, 180, 201;
factitious in composition, 179, 181, 211^3;
distorted neo-classic details worked into a pseudo-Gothic scheme,
184, 190;
a survival of later Gothic habit of design is shown where the
continuity of upright lines is obtained in the use of
superimposed pilasters with ressauts in the entablatures,
188, 190;
has a distinctly French expression, 179, 193, 194;
later French Renaissance given a more marked neo-classic dress by
Lescot and De l’Orme, 194–215;
misuse of structural forms in ornamentation, 199;
excessive profusion of ornament, 200;
church architecture, Gothic structural forms largely entwined
with a misapplication of classic details, 213–215.
Renaissance architecture, Lombard, 135, 136–149;
neo-classic influences confined largely to ornamental details,
136;
illogical scheme of openings which became characteristic of,
144–149 (cuts).
Renaissance architecture, North Italian, profusion of ornament a
marked characteristic of, 136;
Lombard Romanesque forms modified by neo-classic features mark
the character of, 144;
church architecture of the, 135–153 (cuts);
mixture of mediæval and pseudo-classic forms, 149;
palace architecture of the, 154–166 (cuts);
later architecture of the, based on the art of Palladio and
Vignola, 165.
_See_ Renaissance architecture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account