Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural SelectionPoulton, Edward Bagnall, Sir
Science
Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural Selection
Poulton, Edward Bagnall, Sir
Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882; Natural selection
The letters to Mr. John Murray, the publisher, are eminently
characteristic, in the expressions of regret for trouble given, and
of pleasure at the work done, in the scrupulous care to prevent the
publisher from feeling committed, if on further acquaintance with the
manuscript he did not wish to accept it, and in the offer to contribute
towards the cost of corrections.
[Sidenote: THE “ORIGIN” PUBLISHED.]
The first edition of “The Origin of Species” was published November
24th, 1859. The edition consisted of 1,250 copies, all of which were
sold on the day of issue.
The full title of this volume, of which Darwin justly says
(“Autobiography”), “It is no doubt the chief work of my life,” is
reproduced below.
ON
THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES
BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION,
OR THE
PRESERVATION OF FAVOURED RACES IN THE STRUGGLE
FOR LIFE.
BY CHARLES DARWIN, M.A.,
FELLOW OF THE ROYAL, GEOLOGICAL, LINNEAN, ETC., SOCIETIES;
AUTHOR OF “JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES DURING H.M.S. ‘BEAGLE’S’ VOYAGE
ROUND THE WORLD.”
This title is of interest, as has been pointed out by Professor E. Ray
Lankester, in relation to the controversy upon the exact meaning of the
word “Darwinism.” Some writers have argued that the term “Darwinism”
includes the whole of the causes of evolution accepted by Darwin--the
supposed inherited effects of use and disuse and the direct influence
of environment, which find a subordinate place in the “Origin,” as
well as natural selection, which is the real subject of the book and
which is fully defined in the title. It would seem appropriate to
use the term “Darwinism,” as Wallace uses it, to indicate the causes
of evolution which were suggested by Darwin himself, excluding these
supposed causes which had been previously brought forward by earlier
writers, and especially by Lamarck. The causes of evolution proposed
by Lamarck are seriously disputed, and it is possible that they may
be ultimately abandoned. If so, the integrity of “Darwinism,” as
interpreted by some controversialists, would be impaired; and this, it
will be generally admitted, would be most unfortunate, as well as most
unfair to the memory of Darwin.
CHAPTER XV.
THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES (1859).
[Sidenote: THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account