Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
But gigantic as were Dickens’s labours, gigantic as were the exactions
from him, his own plans were more gigantic still. He had the type of
mind that wishes to do every kind of work at once; to do everybody’s
work as well as its own. There floated before him a vision of a
monstrous magazine, entirely written by himself. It is true that
when this scheme came to be discussed, he suggested that other pens
might be occasionally employed; but, reading between the lines, it is
sufficiently evident that he thought of the thing as a kind of vast
multiplication of himself, with Dickens as editor, opening letters,
Dickens as leader-writer writing leaders, Dickens as reporter reporting
meetings, Dickens as reviewer reviewing books, Dickens, for all I know,
as office-boy, opening and shutting doors. This serial, of which he
spoke to Messrs. Chapman and Hall, began and broke off and remains as a
colossal fragment bound together under the title of “Master Humphrey’s
Clock.” One characteristic thing he wished to have in the periodical.
He suggested an Arabian Nights of London, in which Gog and Magog,
the giants of the city, should give forth chronicles as enormous as
themselves. He had a taste for these schemes or frameworks for many
tales. He made and abandoned many; many he half-fulfilled. I strongly
suspect that he meant Major Jackman, in “Mrs. Lirriper’s Lodgings” and
“Mrs. Lirriper’s Legacy,” to start a series of studies of that lady’s
lodgers, a kind of history of No. 81 Norfolk Street, Strand. “The Seven
Poor Travellers” was planned for seven stories; we will not say seven
poor stories. Dickens had meant, probably, to write a tale for each
article of “Somebody’s Luggage”: he only got as far as the hat and the
boots. This gigantesque scale of literary architecture, huge and yet
curiously cosy, is characteristic of his spirit, fond of size and
yet fond of comfort. He liked to have story within story, like room
within room of some labyrinthine but comfortable castle. In this spirit
he wished “Master Humphrey’s Clock” to begin, and to be a big frame
or bookcase for numberless novels. The clock started; but the clock
stopped.
In the prologue by Master Humphrey reappears Mr. Pickwick and Sam
Weller, and of that resurrection many things have been said, chiefly
expressions of a reasonable regret. Doubtless they do not add much to
their author’s reputation, but they add a great deal to their author’s
pleasure. It was ingrained in him to wish to meet old friends. All his
characters are, so to speak, designed to be old friends; in a sense
every Dickens character is an old friend, even when he first appears.
He comes to us mellow out of many implied interviews, and carries the
firelight on his face. Dickens was simply pleased to meet Pickwick
again, and being pleased, he made the old man too comfortable to be
amusing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account