Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
It is true that a particular circumstance sharpened and defined his
disappointment. He felt very hotly, as he felt everything, whether
selfish or unselfish, the injustice of the American piracies of
English literature, resulting from the American copyright laws. He
did not go to America with any idea of discussing this; when, some
time afterwards, somebody said that he did, he violently rejected
the view as only describable “in one of the shortest words in the
English language.” But his entry into America was almost triumphal;
the rostrum or pulpit was ready for him; he felt strong enough to say
anything. He had been most warmly entertained by many American men of
letters, especially by Washington Irving, and in his consequent glow
of confidence he stepped up to the dangerous question of American
copyright. He made many speeches attacking the American law and theory
of the matter as unjust to English writers and to American readers.
The effect appears to have astounded him. “I believe there is no
country,” he writes, “on the face of the earth where there is less
freedom of opinion on any subject in reference to which there is a
broad difference of opinion than in this. There! I write the words
with reluctance, disappointment, and sorrow; but I believe it from
the bottom of my soul.... The notion that I, a man alone by myself in
America, should venture to suggest to the Americans that there was
one point on which they were neither just to their own countrymen nor
to us, actually struck the boldest dumb! Washington Irving, Prescott,
Hoffman, Bryant, Halleck, Dana, Washington Allston--every man who
writes in this country is devoted to the question, and not one of them
_dares_ to raise his voice and complain of the atrocious state of the
law.... The wonder is that a breathing man can be found with temerity
enough to suggest to the Americans the possibility of their having done
wrong. I wish you could have seen the faces that I saw down both sides
of the table at Hartford when I began to talk about Scott. I wish you
could have heard how I gave it out. My blood so boiled when I thought
of the monstrous injustice that I felt as if I were twelve feet high
when I thrust it down their throats.”
That is almost a portrait of Dickens. We can almost see the erect
little figure, its face and hair like a flame.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account