Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
If America had then this Pinkertonian propriety, this new, raw
sensibility, Dickens was the man to rasp it. He was its precise
opposite in every way. The decencies he did respect were old-fashioned
and fundamental. On top of these he had that lounging liberty and
comfort which can only be had on the basis of very old conventions,
like the carelessness of gentlemen and the deliberation of rustics.
He had no fancy for being strung up to that taut and quivering
ideality demanded by American patriots and public speakers. And there
was something else also, connected especially with the question of
copyright and his own pecuniary claims. Dickens was not in the least
desirous of being thought too “high-souled” to want his wages, nor was
he in the least ashamed of asking for them. Deep in him (whether the
modern reader likes the quality or no) was a sense very strong in the
old Radicals--very strong especially in the old English Radicals--a
sense of personal _rights_, one’s own rights included, as something
not merely useful but sacred. He did not think a claim any less just
and solemn because it happened to be selfish; he did not divide claims
into selfish and unselfish, but into right and wrong. It is significant
that when he asked for his money, he never asked for it with that
shamefaced cynicism, that sort of embarrassed brutality, with which
the modern man of the world mutters something about business being
business or looking after number one. He asked for his money in a
valiant and ringing voice, like a man asking for his honour. While his
American critics were moaning and sneering at his interested motives as
a disqualification, he brandished his interested motives like a banner.
“It is nothing to them,” he cries in astonishment, “that, of all men
living, I am the greatest loser by it” (the Copyright Law). “It is
nothing that I have a claim to speak and be heard.” The thing they set
up as a barrier he actually presents as a passport. They think that he,
of all men, ought not to speak because he is interested. He thinks that
he, of all men, ought to speak because he is wronged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account