Charles Lever, His Life in His Letters, Vol. IILever, Charles
General
Charles Lever, His Life in His Letters, Vol. II
Lever, Charles
Lever, Charles James, 1806-1872 -- Correspondence; Novelists, Irish -- 19th century -- Correspondence
“Loss of rest at night and want of fresh air by day have worn me so much
that I have no more energy left in me. Of course years have their share
in this, and I don’t try to blink that.
“Chas. Reade has found a sympathetic critic who has forgotten none of
his merits; not but that on the whole I agree with him, and certainly
concur in the belief that Reade has got nothing like his deserts in
popular favour. The coarsenesses that disfigure him (and they do) are,
after all, not worse than many in Balzac, and no one disputes _his_
supremacy.
“They tell me that the Cabinet can’t agree about the Irish robbery bill;
but I don’t think the thieves will fall out, seeing how much booty they
have to divide elsewhere. It’s rather a good joke to see a Whig
Radical Government trying to revive the Holy Alliance, and sending Lord
Clarendon over Europe to concoct alliances against France. The fear of
what will happen when L. N. dies is a strong bond of interest, and
in the common fear of a great Democratic revolution even Austria and
Prussia are willing to shake hands. Would it be well to O’Dowd them?
“I wish I had three days with you in your breezy atmosphere to shake off
my dumps and my dreariness.”
_To Mr William Blackwood._
“Trieste, _Sunday_, Oct. 10.
“As I have made a slight addition to the ‘Canning’ O’D., I do not like
to delay the proof beyond to-day, to which I waited in hope of a letter
from your uncle.
“I have no good news to send of my poor wife, and I am very low and
dispirited in consequence.
“I had a capital O’D. in my head this morning, but a bad sermon I have
just heard has driven it clean out of my mind. I am quite ready to
disendow my consular chaplain, and won’t give him his Sunday dinner in
consequence.”
_To Mr John Blackwood._
“Trieste, _Oct_. 14,1869.
“Many thanks for your cheque, which I have this moment received.
“You are not, I think, quite just about the last two O’Ds. First of all,
an O’D. need not, nor can it, be always an epigram; it must occasionally
be an argument epigrammatically treated, and ‘Close and the
Carmelite’ is, I believe, such. The changed position of two Churchmen
(representatives as they are of schools of thought) is well worth
notice, and it would be well to show that the Dean’s Protestantism is
not the national religion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account