Charles Lever, His Life in His Letters, Vol. IILever, Charles
General
Charles Lever, His Life in His Letters, Vol. II
Lever, Charles
Lever, Charles James, 1806-1872 -- Correspondence; Novelists, Irish -- 19th century -- Correspondence
and left me never sure when I started for Norway that I might not find
myself in Naples. It is not necessary, perhaps, for me to say that no
character in this tale was drawn from a model. I began the story, in so
far as a few pages went, at a little inn at Killarney, and I believe
I stole the name of Kerry O’Leary from one of the boatmen on the lake;
but, so far as I am aware, it is the only theft in the book. I believe
that the very crude notions of an English tourist for the betterment of
Ireland, and some exceedingly absurd comments he made me on the habits
of people which an acquaintanceship of three weeks enabled him to
pronounce on, provoked me to draw the character of Sir Marmaduke; but I
can declare that the traveller aforesaid only acted as tinder to a mine
long prepared, and afforded me a long-sought-for opportunity--not for
exposing, for I did not go that far, but--for touching on the
consummate effrontery with which a mere passing stranger can settle
the difficulties and determine the remedies for a country in which the
resident sits down overwhelmed by the amount, and utterly despairing of
a solution. I have elsewhere recorded that I have been blamed for the
fate I reserved for Kate O’Donoghue, and that she deserved something
better than to have her future linked to one who was so unworthy of her
in many ways. Till I re-read the story after a long lapse of years, I
had believed that this charge was better founded than I am now disposed
to think it. First of all, judging from an Irish point of view, I do not
consent to regard Mark O’Donoghue as a bad fellow. The greater number
of his faults were the results of neglected training, irregular--almost
utter want of--education, and the false position of an heir to a
property so swamped by debt as to be valueless. I will not say these are
the ingredients which go to the formation of a very regular life or
a very perfect husband, but they might all of them have made a worse
character than Mark’s if he had not possessed some very sterling
qualities as a counterbalance. Secondly, I am not of those who think
that the married life of a man is but the second volume of his bachelor
existence. I rather incline to believe that he starts afresh in life
under circumstances very favourable to the development of whatever is
best, and to the extinguishment of what is worst in him. That is, of
course, where he marries well, and where he allies himself to qualities
of temper and tastes which will serve as the complement, or, at times,
the correctives, of his own. Now Kate O’Donoghue would instance what I
mean in this case. Then I keep my best reason for the last: they liked
each other. This, if not a guarantee for their future happiness, is
still the best “martingale” the game of marriage admits of. I am free to
own that the book I had in my head to write was a far better one than
I have committed to paper, but as this is a sort of event which has
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account