Charles Stewart Parnell: His Love Story and Political LifeO'Shea, Kitty
History
Charles Stewart Parnell: His Love Story and Political Life
O'Shea, Kitty
Parnell, Charles Stewart, 1846-1891
I doubt Lord C.'s power to do so, though I know him to be very
well disposed. However, if neither party can offer a solution of
the question I should prefer the Conservatives to remain in
office, as under them we could at least work out gradually a
solution of the Land question. You will see from this letter
that I am very much in the dark, except as to my own mind and
that of Ireland, that I want information as to whether Mr.
Gladstone has, as I suppose, accepted the principle of a Chamber
for Ireland with power over her domestic and {193} internal
affairs, and, if so, which, if any, of the details contained in
sketch he objects to or is in doubt about. Further, it is
important that I should be advised before the meeting of
Parliament what procedure would in his judgment be best for
bringing about that change of Government which would enable Mr.
Gladstone to deal authoritatively with the Irish question.--Yours
very truly, CHAS. S. PARNELL.
I sent this letter to Gladstone, and on December 16, three days
before the completion of the General Election, he dispatched from
Hawarden a long reply; but he said nothing more than he had already
said in public at Midlothian and elsewhere and in private letters to
me. Throughout this period the one fact apparent was that he would
pledge the Liberal Party to nothing until he was in office and
supported by the Irish Party. While there was a Tory Government in
alliance with Parnell he would do nothing. Whether or no he was
sincere in his advice to us to take Home Rule rather from the Tories
than the Liberals if possible--because many Liberals would support a
Tory Home Rule Bill, while all Tories would oppose a Liberal
measure--this I cannot say. He offered it constantly, though he
urged that a trafficking with both Parties for the purpose of getting
the best terms possible, when, as in the end it must be, avowed,
would injure a Tory measure and kill a Liberal one.
The result of the election was that the Tories in alliance with the
Parnellites outnumbered the Liberals by four. The Liberals in
alliance with Parnell would have outnumbered the Tories by 167.
Parnell had swept the board in Ireland, and in the House of Commons
he was dictator.
Immediately after the General Election the Salisbury Cabinet met to
consider its Irish policy, and Lord Carnarvon at once tendered his
resignation. The conclusion {194} to be drawn is obvious. Compact
or no compact, Lord Carnarvon had reason to believe that the Cabinet
were prepared to pursue a certain line of policy which it now
appeared they had no intention of pursuing. The reason for the
_volte face_, too, is plain. Tories plus Parnellites formed too
narrow a majority of the House for Governmental purposes. The Irish
were no longer of any use, and they were abandoned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account