Charles Stewart Parnell: His Love Story and Political LifeO'Shea, Kitty
History
Charles Stewart Parnell: His Love Story and Political Life
O'Shea, Kitty
Parnell, Charles Stewart, 1846-1891
On June 7th Mr. Parnell spoke on the Home Rule Bill. It was the last
night of the debate, and he had carefully prepared his speech.
The rejection of the Bill by a full House--343 against {201} 313
votes--was immediately followed by the dissolution of Parliament.
Thus in July, 1886, the Liberals went out in alliance with the Irish
leader, whom, only twelve months before, they had gone out
_denouncing_ with all his followers.
So ends the most important period of my negotiations with Gladstone.
The subsequent course of them may be sketched briefly.
In July, 1886, Gladstone replied to certain suggestions of Parnell
recommending perseverance with the Home Rule scheme, with the
objection that he was unable to carry the Gladstonian Party beyond a
certain point.
There were times when Mr. Gladstone became somewhat uneasy in regard
to the possible consequences of so many interviews with me. Also
someone said once to him, "Supposing Mrs. O'Shea told Parnell you
said so and so, and it was more than you meant to say?" On June
15th, 1887, for example, he wrote asking with utmost politeness for a
letter instead of an interview.
However, on August 22nd of the same year I find him writing from
Hawarden thanking me for some gift (of game or fruit) and expressing
hope of the future.
Gladstone now told me that he wished to meet Parnell in order to talk
over the political situation, and I suggested that a visit to
Hawarden by Parnell would have a good effect politically. Gladstone
then asked Parnell to Hawarden to discuss the outlook in politics, an
invitation which Parnell did not answer at once, as he first wished
to ascertain the tactics of the Conservative Party.
On August 30th, 1889, Mr. Gladstone wrote to Parnell a most private
letter, lamenting that he had not heard from him and his friends with
reference to a visit to Hawarden. The fact was that since Parnell
had received {202} Gladstone's invitation the Tories had been making
advances, and had just proffered a Roman Catholic University for
Ireland. Gladstone was right in supposing that here was the cause of
Parnell's silence. He was not angry, but he threatened Parnell with
the effect of this new proposal on Nonconformist and Presbyterian
Liberals.
In October the air was clearer, the Government's Irish University
scheme had gone awry, and Gladstone was jubilant. He wrote on the
16th renewing the invitation. With regard to the Home Rule Bill he
was all for reserve; with regard to Parnell's action against the
_Times_ all for dispatch.
It was two months later, however (on December 19th), that Parnell, on
his way to Liverpool, visited Gladstone at Hawarden. It was a short
but agreeable visit, and at dinner Mr. Parnell sat next to Miss
Gladstone. The conversation turned upon actors and acting, and Miss
Gladstone said, "Who is the greatest actor you have ever seen, Mr.
Parnell?" "Your father, undoubtedly!" he promptly returned, much to
her delight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account