In the month of January, 1846, the President of the United States
directed the troops under General Taylor, called the Army of
Occupation, to take possession of this region. Here was an act of
aggression. As might have been expected, it produced collision.
The Mexicans, aroused in self-defence, sought to repel the invaders
from their hearths and churches. Unexpected tidings reached
Washington that the American forces were in danger. The President,
in a message to Congress, called for succors.
Here the question occurs, What was the duty of Congress in this
emergency? Clearly to withhold all sanction to unjust war,--to
aggression upon a neighboring Republic,--to spoliation of
fellow-men. Our troops were in danger only because upon foreign
soil, forcibly displacing the jurisdiction and laws of the rightful
government. In this condition of things, the way of safety, just
and honorable, was by instant withdrawal from the Rio Grande to the
Nueces. Congress should have spoken like Washington, when General
Braddock, staggered by the peril of the moment, asked the youthful
soldier, "What shall I do, Colonel Washington?" "RETREAT, Sir!
RETREAT, Sir!" was the earnest reply. The American forces should
have been directed to _retreat_,--not from any human force, but
from _wrong-doing_; and this would have been a true victory.
Alas! this was not the mood of Congress. With wicked speed a
bill was introduced, furnishing large and unusual supplies of
men and money. In any just sense, such provision was wasteful
and unnecessary; but it would hardly be worthy of criticism, if
confined in its object to the safety of the troops. When made,
it must have been known that the fate of the troops was already
decided, while the magnitude of the appropriations and the number
of volunteers called for showed that measures were contemplated
_beyond self-defence_. Self-defence is easy and cheap. Aggression
and injustice are difficult and costly.
The bill, in its earliest guise, provided money and volunteers
only. Suddenly an amendment is introduced, in the nature of a
preamble, which gives to it _another character_, in harmony with
the covert design of the large appropriation. This was adopted by
a vote of 123 to 67; and the bill then leaped forth, fully armed,
as a measure of open and active hostility against Mexico. As such,
it was passed by a vote of 174 to 14. This was on the 11th of May,
1846, destined to be among the dark days of our history.
The amendment, in the nature of a preamble, and the important part
of the bill, are as follows.
"_Whereas, by the act of the Republic of Mexico, a state of war exists
between that Government and the United States,_--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account