Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 03 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 03 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
The people in every part of the country, East and West, North and
South, of all political parties and all religious sects, are now
invited to join in this endeavor. So doing, while confident of the
blessing of God, they will become fellow-laborers of wise and good
men in other lands, and will secure to themselves the inexpressible
satisfaction of aiding the advent of that happy day when Peace shall be
_organized_ among nations.
By order of the Peace Congress Committee for the United States.
CHARLES SUMNER, _Chairman_.
ELIHU BURRITT, } _Secretaries_.
AMASA WALKER, }
BOSTON, February 22, 1850.
* * * * *
OUR IMMEDIATE ANTISLAVERY DUTIES.
SPEECH AT A FREE-SOIL MEETING AT FANEUIL HALL, NOVEMBER 6,
1850.
This speech was made a few days before the annual election in
Massachusetts, and just after the passage of the Fugitive Slave
Bill. As the first open denunciation of this measure, it awakened
much feeling on both sides. All who felt strongly against Slavery
were grateful.
It is sometimes said to have made Mr. Sumner Senator. More than
anything else, it determined his selection by the Free-Soil party
shortly afterwards as their candidate. On the other hand, it was
often pronounced "treasonable," and in subsequent discussions at
Washington, sometimes in newspapers and repeatedly in the Senate,
it was employed to point the personalities of slave-masters and
their allies. It was called the "Mark Antony speech." It takes the
ground to which Mr. Sumner constantly adhered, that the "Fugitive
Slave Bill," as he always insisted upon calling it,--refusing to
call it Law,--was absolutely unconstitutional in all respects,--not
only, according to the old language of the law, "to a certain
intent in general," but also "to a certain intent in every
particular." Such an enactment could not be treated as law; and Mr.
Sumner insisted that good citizens should refuse to it all support,
as our fathers refused all support to the British Stamp Act. His
effort and hope were to create a public sentiment which would
render its enforcement impossible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account