Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 04 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 04 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
"The feelings of the people disclosed since the year 1760 in the
votes of towns and in the verdicts of juries, ... the fact that
there is no law at present in force which makes a distinction
between white and black persons, ... the same law which allows
justices to expel blacks from the State after a certain notice
expressly recognizing the right of blacks to become citizens (a
law, the constitutionality of which has been called in question,
and which it is well known was passed on the same day as the
Abolition Act of March, 1788, in order to prevent the State from
being overrun with runaway slaves),--blacks having the same public
provisions for education, and the same public support in case of
sickness and poverty,--many blacks before and during the Revolution
having obtained their freedom by a legal process, and, as the
spirit of the Constitution of this State abrogates all exclusive
laws, thereby becoming invested with all the rights of freemen,
and with a capability of becoming freeholders, ... and, above all,
the construction given to the first principle in the Declaration
of Rights at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, both
in the public mind and in the courts of law,--clearly manifest
and demonstrate that the people of this Commonwealth have always
believed negroes and mulattoes to possess the same right and
capability to become citizens as white persons."
God forbid that I should do injustice to South Carolina! I know well
the gallantry of many of her sons. I know the response which she made
to the appeal of Massachusetts for union against the Stamp Act--the
Fugitive Slave Act of that day--by the pen of Christopher Gadsden.
And I remember with sorrow that this patriot was obliged to confess,
at the time, her "weakness in having such a number of slaves," though
it is to his credit that he recognized Slavery as "crime."[97] I
have no pleasure in dwelling on the humiliations of South Carolina;
I have little desire to expose her sores; I would not lay bare even
her nakedness. But the Senator, in his vaunt for "slaveholding
communities," has made a claim for Slavery so derogatory to Freedom,
and so inconsistent with history, that I cannot allow it to pass
unanswered.
[97] Bancroft, History of the United States, Vol. V. pp. 294, 425,
426.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account