There was still another, the Senator from Virginia, who is now also in my eye. That Senator said nothing of argument, and therefore there is nothing of that to be answered. I simply say to him that hard words are not argument, frowns are not reasons, nor do scowls belong to the proper arsenal of parliamentary debate. The Senator has not forgotten that on a former occasion I did something to exhibit the plantation manners which he displays. I will not do any more now. APPENDIX. On the second day after the Speech an event occurred which aroused the country, and was characterized at the time by an eminent English statesman, Sir George Cornewall Lewis, as “the beginning of civil war.” Mr. Sumner was sitting at his desk in the Senate Chamber shortly after the adjournment of the Senate, when he was attacked by the Hon. Preston S. Brooks, a Representative of South Carolina, and by a succession of blows on the head with a bludgeon rendered senseless. As confederates with Mr. Brooks were Hon. Lawrence M. Keitt, a Representative of South Carolina, and Hon. Henry A. Edmundson, a Representative of Virginia, who stood at some distance, evidently to sustain the assault. Mr. Sumner sunk upon the floor of the Senate Chamber. After some time he was carried to an adjoining room, where his wounds were dressed, and he was then taken to his lodgings. The newspapers of the time attest the profound and wide-spread excitement. The titles of the articles are suggestive. “The Attempt to murder Mr. Sumner,”--“Ruffianism National,”--“Blood in the Senate,”--“Outrageous Assault on Senator Sumner,”--“Brutal and Cowardly Assault upon Charles Sumner,”--“Ruffianism in Washington,”--“A Crisis at Hand,”--“The Outrage on Mr. Sumner,”--“Atrocious Outrage,”--“Disgraceful Assault upon a Senator,”--“Another Outrage upon Massachusetts,”--“A Border Ruffian in the Senate,”--“The Last Argument of Slavery,”--“Barbarism at the Capitol,”--“Shame! Shame!” Such were the general voices. The article in the _National Intelligencer_ at Washington was entitled “Painful Occurrence.” This incident is inseparable from the speech on the Crime against Kansas, although some have supposed that the earlier speech, of June 28, 1854, in Reply to Assailants,[140] contributed essentially to the feeling which broke forth on this occasion. The documents, resolutions, speeches, and articles which it prompted would occupy volumes. An attempt will be made to present an abstract under the following heads. I. THE ASSAULT. II. ADOPTION OF THE ASSAULT BY EMINENT SLAVE-MASTERS, AND BY THE SOUTH GENERALLY. III. PREVIOUS PERSONALITIES AND AGGRESSIONS. IV. VOICE OF THE NORTH. V. INJURIES AND CONTINUED DISABILITY OF MR. SUMNER. I. THE ASSAULT. On Friday, May 23, the day after the assault, Hon. Henry Wilson, colleague of Mr. Sumner, rising in his seat immediately after the reading of the Journal, made the following remarks.