Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 05 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 05 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
On which the _Globe_ remarks:--
“Mr. Brooks then walked out of the House of
Representatives.”[144]
In fact, his resignation was already in the hands of the Governor of
South Carolina, to take effect on his announcing his resignation to the
House. In this way he avoided any other censure, after the failure of
the resolution of expulsion.
Returning to South Carolina, Mr. Brooks presented himself again to his
constituents, and was triumphantly reëlected. On the 1st of August,
1856, his commission was presented to the House, when, according to the
_Globe_, he “came forward and the Speaker administered to him the oath
to support the Constitution of the United States.”
While proceedings were pending in the House, Mr. Brooks was indicted by
the Grand Jury of the District of Columbia. The following letters of
Mr. Sumner, written at Silver Spring, near Washington, where he was the
guest of F. P. Blair, Esq., show his indisposition to take part in the
proceedings.
“SILVER SPRING, June 30, 1856.
“DEAR SIR,--I find myself unable to attend Court to-day. Since
the summons of the Marshal, I have suffered a relapse, by which
I am enfeebled, and also admonished against exertion. Being
out of town, I have not had an opportunity of consulting my
attending physician; but a skilful medical friend, who has
visited me here, earnestly insists that I cannot attend Court
for some time without peril to my health.
“I have the honor to be, dear Sir,
“Your faithful servant,
“CHARLES SUMNER.
“P. BARTON KEY, Esq., Attorney of the United States.”
“SILVER SPRING, July 1, 1856.
“DEAR SIR,--I have your letter of 30th June, in which you ask
my consent with regard to the course you shall take in the
conduct of a criminal proceeding now pending in the Circuit
Court of the United States for the District of Columbia. I am
surprised at this communication. In giving my testimony before
the Grand Jury, I stated that I appeared at the summons of
the law, and that I wished it distinctly understood that the
proceeding was instituted without any suggestion on my part,
and that I had nothing to do, directly or indirectly, with its
conduct. Nothing has occurred to change my relation to the
proceeding. Its whole conduct belongs to the Attorney of the
United States.
“I am, dear Sir,
“Your faithful servant,
“CHARLES SUMNER.
“P. BARTON KEY, Esq., Attorney of the United States.”
When the trial came on, Mr. Sumner had left for Philadelphia. Mr.
Brooks was sentenced to pay a fine of three hundred dollars.
William Y. Leader, of Philadelphia, who testified before the
magistrate, drew up the following account of the assault, which is now
published for the first time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account