Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 07 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 07 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will
authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or
interfere within any State with the domestic institutions
thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service
by the laws of said State.”
Bills and joint resolutions must be read on three several
days; but on ordinary occasions they receive their first and
second readings the same day. Mr. Sumner, unwilling that this
other attempt should be hurried through the Senate, objected
to the second reading on the first day, and the next day had
a question with Mr. Douglas on the correction of the Journal,
which failed to record his objection. On his motion the Journal
was corrected.[132] The Senate then suspended the rule
requiring the three readings of a Constitutional amendment on
three separate days, and proceeded to the consideration of the
proposed amendment. Mr. Pugh, of Ohio, spoke lightly of its
composition, saying:--
“I think it was De Quincey who said, that, next to the duty
which a man owes God and his country and his family, it was
his duty to preserve the purity of his mother tongue. The
Constitution of the United States is written in excellent
English; but if this amendment be expressed in the English
language, or by any rule of grammar, I do not understand
it.”
Mr. Crittenden replied, that he could “bear with bad English,
when it expressed a good thing.”
The vote on its passage was 24 yeas to 12 nays, as follows.
_Yeas_,--Messrs. Anthony, Baker, Bigler, Bright,
Crittenden, Dixon, Douglas, Foster, Grimes, Gwin, Harlan,
Hunter, Johnson of Tennessee, Kennedy, Latham, Mason,
Morrill, Nicholson, Polk, Pugh, Rice, Sebastian, Ten Eyck,
Thomson,--24.
_Nays_,--Messrs. Bingham, Chandler, Clark, Doolittle,
Durkee, Foot, King, Sumner, Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson,
Wilson,--12.
Two thirds of the Senate present voting for the joint
resolution, it was agreed to. The proposed amendment to the
Constitution was never adopted by the States. It remains in the
national archives, a singular instance of bad composition, and
the monument of a fruitless effort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account