Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 09 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 09 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“‘And God said to Abraham, Have I borne with you [him]
these fourscore years, and canst thou not bear with him
one night, who art thyself a sinner?’ Sir, in exactly
the spirit inculcated by that fable I would deal with
Slavery; and I would listen to-day as it were to the voice
of God, who asks us, Have I borne with this thing so many
generations, and cannot you bear with it dying, when it
begins on the next Fourth of July?”[79]
Mr. Wade, in the same spirit, said:--
“My friend from Massachusetts, by his proposition, strikes
this institution down at one dash. I should like to see it
go; but I must look a little to see what its effect will
be, after all.”[80]
Before the vote was taken, Mr. Carlile, of Virginia, remarked:--
“Mr. President, it is my sincere belief that this
disposition to interfere with the rights of the States,
exhibited by this Congress, has prolonged the war,--that,
if persisted in, the war becomes a war of indefinite
duration, and that the Constitutional Union our fathers
formed will be lost to us and our posterity forever.”[81]
July 14th, the question was taken on Mr. Sumner’s amendment,
which was rejected,--Yeas 11, Nays 24.
Mr. Lane, of Kansas, moved that all slaves in the State, July
4, 1863, and under the age of ten, shall be free when they
arrive at the age of twenty-one, and all slaves over ten and
under twenty-one shall be free when they arrive at the age of
twenty-five; and the amendment was adopted,--Yeas 25, Nays 12.
* * * * *
The question then occurred on the passage of the bill, when Mr.
Sumner remarked:--
I renounce the intention of presenting again the amendment you have
already voted down; but it is none the less important in my judgment.
I do not like to occupy the time of the Senate; but I cannot doubt
that you have acted on the amendment hastily, and without full
consideration. Why, Sir, it is simply the old Jeffersonian ordinance,
which, when originally adopted for the great Territory of the
Northwest, operated upon Slavery already there, and absolutely forbade
this wrong from that time forward. In point of fact, slaves were freed
by this ordinance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account