Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“Gentlemen, I trust that our abhorrence of Slavery is not
in the least abated or diminished. [_Loud and prolonged
cheers._] For my own part, I consider it one of the most
horrible crimes that yet disgrace humanity. [_Cheers._]
But then, when we are treating of the relations which we
bear to a community of men, I doubt whether it would be
expedient or useful for humanity that we should introduce
that new element of declaring that _we will have no
relations with a people who permit Slavery to exist among
them. We have never adopted it yet, we have not adopted it
in the case of Spain or Brazil, and I do not believe that
the cause of humanity would be served by our adoption of
it._ [‘_Hear! hear!_’]
“Well, then it was said that these Confederate States were
Rebels,--Rebels against the Union. Perhaps, Gentlemen,
I am not so nice as I ought to be on the subject. But
I recollect that we rebelled against Charles the First
[_a laugh_], we rebelled against James the Second, and
the people of New England, not content with these two
rebellions, rebelled against George the Third. [_‘Hear!’
and laughter._] … But, certainly, if I look to the
declarations of those New England orators,--and I have
been reading lately, if not the whole, yet a very great
part, of the very long speech by Mr. Sumner on the subject,
delivered at New York,--I own, I cannot but wonder to see
these men, the offspring, as it were, of three rebellions,
as we are the offspring of two rebellions, really speaking,
like the Czar of Russia, the Sultan of Turkey, or Louis
the Fourteenth himself, of the dreadful crime and guilt of
rebellion. [_Loud laughter and cheers._] …
“I said, that in America, although there were some of the
local courts which had not the authority of such men as
Lord Stowell and Sir William Grant, yet there was a Court
of Appeal, there was a Supreme Court, in the United States,
which contained, and had for many years contained, men as
learned and of as high reputation in the law and of as
unsullied reputation for integrity as any that have sat in
our English courts of justice, and that we ought to wait
patiently for the decision of those tribunals. Now what
is my surprise to find, and what would be your surprise
to find, that Mr. Sumner is so prejudiced that he brings
these declarations of mine against me, saying _that I have
diminished the reputation of the American Courts_, and that
I showed myself biased against the Federal States, by the
declaration I then made in Parliament! [_A gentleman from
the Southern States among the company here ejaculated, ‘He
is not to be believed.’_]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account