Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
It will be observed that these records of this verse fail to mention
the immediate author. Was he unknown at the time? or did the fact
that he was recently a Cabinet Minister induce him to hide behind
a mask? Turgot was a master of epigram,--as witness the terrible
lines on Frederick of Prussia;[252] but he was very prudent in
conduct. “Nobody,” said Voltaire, “so skilful to launch the shaft
without showing the hand.” There is a letter from no less a person
than D’Alembert, which reveals something of the “filing” which the
verse underwent, and something of the persons consulted. Unhappily,
the letter is without date; nor does it appear to whom it was
addressed, except that the “_cher confrère_” seems to imply that
it was to a brother of the Academy. This letter is found in a work
now known to have been the compilation of the Marquis Gaëtan de la
Rochefoucauld,[253] entitled “Mémoires de Condorcet sur la Révolution
Française, extraits de sa Correspondance et de celles de ses Amis,” and
is introduced by the following words from the Marquis:--
“It is known how Franklin was fêted when he came to Paris,
because he was the representative of a republic. The
philosophers, especially, received him with enthusiasm. It may
be said, among other things, that D’Alembert lost his sleep;
and we are going to prove it by a letter which he wrote, while
racking his brain to versify in honor of Franklin.”
The letter is then given as follows:--
“FRIDAY MORNING.
“MY DEAR COLLEAGUE,-- … You are acquainted with the Franklin
verse,--
‘Eripuit cœlo fulmen, _mox sceptra_ tyrannis.’
You should surely cause it to be put in the Paris paper, if it
is not there already.
“I am inclined to agree with La Harpe that _sceptrumque_ is
better: first, because _mox sceptra_ is a little hard, and then
because _mox_, according to the dictionary of Gesner, who
adduces examples, signifies equally _statim_ or _deinde_, which
makes an ambiguity, _mox eripuit_ or _mox eripiet_.
“Be that as it may, here is how I have attempted to translate
this verse for the portrait of Franklin:--
‘Tu vois le sage courageux
Dont l’heureux et mâle génie
Arracha le tonnerre aux dieux
Et le sceptre à la tyrannie.’
If you find these verses sufficiently tolerable, so that people
will not laugh at me, you can have them put into the Paris
paper, even with my name. I shall honor myself in rendering
this homage to Franklin, but on condition once more that you
find the verses _printable_. As I make little pretension on
account of them, I shall be perfectly content, if you reject
them as bad.
“The third verse might be put, _A ravi le tonnerre aux cieux_
or _aux dieux_. I should prefer the other; but you shall
choose.”[254]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account