Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
In point of law, it seems obvious, if enlistments were made in good
faith under the statute of 1861, and there was no legal objection
to those enlistments, then the United States are bound. If, on the
contrary, they were made under the subsequent statute, then it is
simply a question of policy and expediency whether we shall make this
payment. The whole subject is open to discussion,--first, in the light
of sentiment, which may involve expediency and policy, and, secondly,
in the light of law. I shall not say anything upon it in the first
aspect, except to make one remark,--that our country at this moment can
ill afford to take the responsibility of refusing justice to colored
soldiers whom it has allowed to shed their blood in its cause. The soul
repudiates any such sacrifice,--for sacrifice it will be, at once of
honor and of interest. I do not follow out this idea, but pass at once
to the second aspect, which I called the question of law; and there I
differ from my learned friend from Connecticut, when I say that there
are certain colored regiments in the field who in point of law are
entitled to the full wages of thirteen dollars a month.
MR. FOSTER. If the Senator will pardon me, I insisted on that
fact, and said they were enlisted, not under the law, but under
instructions from the Department, authorizing the officers to
enlist them on the same terms that white troops were enlisted,
which would be thirteen dollars per month.
MR. SUMNER. Very well. I still understood the Senator to imply
that perhaps in point of law there might be some doubt whether the
Government was liable for the thirteen dollars a month. I propose to
carry the argument a little further, and show, by calling attention for
one moment to the statutes,--not at any great length,--that, under the
statutes themselves, the Government is obliged to pay certain regiments
thirteen dollars a month.
I begin with the Massachusetts fifty-fourth and fifty-fifth regiments;
and these may be taken as examples. I have before me the actual order
under which those two regiments were raised.
“WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, January 26, 1863.
“_Ordered_, That Governor Andrew, of Massachusetts, is
authorized, until further orders, to raise such number of
volunteer companies of artillery for duty in the forts of
Massachusetts and elsewhere, and such corps of infantry for the
volunteer military service, as he may find convenient; _such
volunteers to be enlisted for three years_,”--
Mark, Sir, if you please, the period of service,--“for three years,”--
“or until sooner discharged, _and may include persons of
African descent_, organized into separate corps. He will make
the usual needful requisitions on the appropriate staff bureaus
and officers for the proper transportation, organization,
supplies, subsistence, arms, and equipments, of such volunteers.
“EDWIN M. STANTON, _Secretary of War_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account