Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 11 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 11 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
The amendment of Mr. Hendricks was rejected. Mr. Willey, of
West Virginia, then spoke against the bill. He said: “In my
opinion, after as close and careful an examination of this bill
as I have been able to give to it, its proper title would be ‘A
bill to reënslave freedmen.’ … Sir, in the name of Liberty and
Emancipation I protest against the passage of any such bill by
the American Senate.”
June 15th, the debate was continued, when the bill was opposed
by Mr. Saulsbury, of Delaware, Mr. Hicks, of Maryland, and Mr.
Grimes, of Iowa. Mr. Ten Eyck, of New Jersey, spoke in favor
of it. Mr. Carlile, of Virginia, moved to postpone its further
consideration to the first Monday of December next, which was
lost,--Yeas 13, Nays 23. Mr. Grimes was particularly severe in
his criticism, which drew from Mr. Sumner the following reply.
I am sorry that I am obliged to say another word in this debate. I had
hoped to be excused. But the remarks of the Senator from Iowa [Mr.
GRIMES] leave me no alternative.
I am not astonished at the opposition this bill has encountered
from Senators over the way. It is their vocation to oppose every
such measure, and to give it, if possible, a bad name. They believe
in Slavery more or less, and will not do anything to remove it or to
mitigate its terrible curse. There is the Senator from West Virginia
[Mr. WILLEY], who gives us smooth words for Freedom, with boasts of the
slaves he has emancipated, and then straightway, by voice and vote,
sustains slave-hunting, and, if possible, worse still, startles the
Senate by a menace that slaves set free by Act of Congress will be
reënslaved by States restored to the Union. That this Senator should
attack a bill for a Bureau of Freedmen is perfectly natural; nor am
I astonished that he should misrepresent its character. But I cannot
conceal my surprise at the course of the Senator from Iowa, who I know
has no love for Slavery, and no congenital, persistent, and rooted
prejudices against the colored race. If the Senator from West Virginia
spoke naturally, allow me to say that my friend from Iowa spoke
unnaturally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account