Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 11 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 11 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
In the Senate the bill was referred to the Committee on
Territories, of which Mr. Wade was Chairman. May 27th, he
reported it to the Senate with amendments. July 1st, it was on
his motion considered, and, in order to save the bill at that
late day of the session, he abandoned the amendments reported,
the most important of which was to strike out the word “white,”
so as to read “all male citizens of the United States.” This
amendment was rejected, by Yeas 5, Nays 24,--the minority being
Messrs. Gratz Brown, Lane, of Kansas, Morgan, of New York,
Pomeroy, of Kansas, and Sumner. Mr. Gratz Brown then moved to
substitute for the whole bill a single section, providing that
the inhabitants of a State declared to be in insurrection shall
not cast any vote for electors of President or Vice-President,
or elect Senators or Representatives in Congress, until the
suppression of the insurrection, “nor until such return to
obedience shall be declared by proclamation of the President,
issued by virtue of an Act of Congress, hereafter to be
passed, authorizing the same.” This was in conformity with
propositions introduced by Mr. Sumner.[366] The House bill was
unsatisfactory, inasmuch as it founded the new governments on
“white male citizens”: but, besides asserting the power of
Congress over the Rebel States, it decreed the abolition of
Slavery in these States; therefore Mr. Sumner favored it. But
the substitute of Mr. Brown prevailed,--Yeas 17, Nays 16.
Mr. Sumner then brought forward his bill, originally reported
from the Committee on Slavery and Freedmen, and moved it as an
additional section:--
“_And be it further enacted_, That the Proclamation of
Emancipation, issued by the President of the United States
on the 1st day of January, 1863, so far as the same
declares that the slaves in certain designated States and
portions of States thenceforward should be free, is hereby
adopted and enacted as a statute of the United States, and
as a rule and article for the government of the military
and naval forces thereof.”
Mr. Hale, of New Hampshire, was in favor of this, but thought
it “incongruous and out of place here.” Mr. Sumner followed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account