Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
MR. HENDERSON. I am certainly very much obliged to the
Senator from Massachusetts. I feel now ten times better
than I did before. [_Laughter._]--I cannot longer detain
the Senate in presenting objections to the exercise
of legislative power under the guaranty clause. It is
sufficient to control my own action, that I believe by the
letter, and even spirit of the Constitution, the suffrage
was placed exclusively under the control of State action.
I think that the error of so placing it is as clear as the
error made in tolerating Slavery. To rid ourselves of the
evil, however, we must amend the Constitution.
MR. SUMNER. Do I understand my friend that a State might
adopt a rule founded on the color of the hair, so that
all men with light hair should be excluded from suffrage?
I insist that a State is not authorized, under the
Constitution, to make any exclusion on account of color.
MR. HENDERSON. It ought not to be, you mean.
MR. SUMNER. No,--it cannot be. Color cannot be a
qualification. There may be a qualification founded on age,
or residence, or knowledge, or crime.
MR. HENDERSON. You are now coming in conflict with the
Committee of Fifteen, who declare by their resolution
that the States now have the power, and may yet exclude
everybody of a particular race or color.
MR. SUMNER. The Committee propose to place that in the
Constitution, which is one reason why I object to their
report. I say that they propose to do what our fathers
never did.
MR. HENDERSON. The Senator from Massachusetts is in theory,
perhaps, correct. He is speaking, however, of an ideal
Constitution.
The following colloquy also occurred.
MR. HENDERSON. The Senator from Massachusetts proposes to
do by an Act of Congress what I think can only be done by
a Constitutional Amendment. That is the difference now
between the Senator from Illinois [Mr. YATES] and myself.
I think the Amendment can be adopted. Indeed, I feel
confident of it.
MR. SUMNER. What Amendment?
MR. HENDERSON. An Amendment to the Constitution preventing
any discrimination against the negro in the right of
suffrage because of color.
MR. SUMNER. It cannot.
MR. HENDERSON. I thought in the bright lexicon of the
Senator from Massachusetts there was no such word as “fail.”
MR. SUMNER. I thought the Senator meant that this
proposition of the Reconstruction Committee could be
adopted.
MR. HENDERSON. Oh, no! I never thought that.
MR. SUMNER. I believe that the Senator’s proposition can be
adopted--gratefully adopted--by the country; but the other
cannot be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account