Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
December 10th, the Suffrage Bill for the District of Columbia,
considered in the former session of Congress,[74] was again
taken up for consideration, when Mr. Cowan, of Pennsylvania,
moved to amend it by striking out the word “male,” so that
there should be no limitation of sex. December 12th, after
debate, this motion was rejected,--Yeas 9, Nays 37. The
Senators voting in the affirmative were Mr. Anthony, of
Rhode Island, Mr. Gratz Brown, of Missouri, Mr. Buckalew,
of Pennsylvania, Mr. Cowan, of Pennsylvania, Mr. Foster,
of Connecticut, Mr. Nesmith, of Oregon, Mr. Patterson, of
Tennessee, Mr. Riddle, of Delaware, and Mr. Wade, of Ohio.
The following amendment was then moved by Mr. Dixon, of
Connecticut:--
“_Provided_, That no person who has not heretofore voted in
this District shall be permitted to vote, unless he shall
be able, at the time of offering to vote, to read, and also
to write his own name.”
December 13th, at this stage of the debate, Mr. Sumner said:--
MR. PRESIDENT,--I have already voted against the motion to strike
out the word “male,” and I shall vote against the pending proposition
to fix an educational test. In each case I am governed by the same
consideration.
In voting against striking out the word “male,” I did not intend to
express any opinion on the question, which has at last found its
way into the Senate Chamber, whether women shall be invested with
the elective franchise. That question I leave untouched, contenting
myself with the remark, that it is obviously the great question of the
future,--at least one of the great questions,--which will be easily
settled, whenever the women in any considerable proportion insist that
it shall be settled. And so, in voting against an educational test, I
do not mean to say that under other circumstances such test may not be
proper. But I am against it now.
The present bill is for the benefit of the colored race in the District
of Columbia. It completes Emancipation by Enfranchisement. It entitles
all to vote without distinction of color. The courts and the rail-cars
of the District, even the galleries of Congress, have been opened.
The ballot-box must be opened also. Such is my sense not only of
the importance, but of the necessity of this measure, so essential
does it appear to me for the establishment of peace, security, and
reconciliation, which I so earnestly covet, that I am unwilling to see
it clogged, burdened, or embarrassed by anything else. I wish to vote
on it alone. Therefore, whatever the merits of other questions, I have
no difficulty in putting them aside until this is settled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account