Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
MR. COWAN. I beg the honorable Senator’s pardon. I would
not diminish his stature an inch or half an inch, nor take
a hair from his head; and he weighs one hundred and forty
pounds, if you please. Is that equality? The honorable
Senator from Massachusetts is largely learned; he has
traversed the whole field of human learning; there is
nothing, I think, that he does not know, that is worth
knowing,--and this is no empty compliment that I desire to
pay him now; and he is so much wiser than I am, that at the
last elections he divined exactly how they would result,
and I did not. [_Laughter._] He rode triumphantly upon the
popular wave; and I was overwhelmed, and came out with eyes
and nose suffused, and hardly able to gasp.
MR. SUMNER. You ought to have followed my counsel.
MR. COWAN. Why should I not? What was Providence doing
in that? If Providence had made me equal to the honorable
Senator, I should not have needed his counsel, and I should
have ridden, too, on the topmost wave. [_Laughter._]
January 9th, the amendment of Mr. Gratz Brown was
rejected,--Yeas 8, Nays 24. The Senators voting in the
affirmative were Mr. Cowan, of Pennsylvania, Mr. Edmunds, of
Vermont, Mr. Fessenden, of Maine, Mr. Grimes, of Iowa, Mr.
Howe, of Wisconsin, Mr. Morgan, of New York, Mr. Poland, of
Vermont, and Mr. Sumner.
Mr. Edmunds then moved the following amendment:--
“That this act shall take effect with the fundamental and
perpetual condition that within said State of Nebraska
there shall be no abridgment or denial of the exercise of
the elective franchise or of any other right to any person
by reason of race or color, excepting Indians not taxed.”
It will be observed that this differs from Mr. Sumner’s in
not requiring the submission of the fundamental condition to
the voters of the Territory. This amendment was lost by a
tie-vote,--Yeas 18, Nays 18. At the next stage of the bill,
being again moved by Mr. Edmunds, it was adopted,--Yeas 20,
Nays 18. The bill was then passed by the Senate,--Yeas 24, Nays
15.
* * * * *
In the other House, the proviso adopted by the Senate was
changed, on motion of Mr. Boutwell, of Massachusetts, so as to
require that the Legislature of the State should by a solemn
public act declare consent to the fundamental condition, and
the bill was then passed,--Yeas 103, Nays 55. In this amendment
the Senate concurred.
February 8th, the bill was again passed in the Senate, by a
two-thirds vote, over the veto of the President,--Yeas 31,
Nays 9; and February 9th, in the other House, by a two-thirds
vote,--Yeas 120, Nays 44. And so the bill became a law.[49]
Colorado was less fortunate.[50]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account