Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 15 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 15 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
But you will allow me to remind you that the ideas of the Revolution
and the solemn promises of the Declaration of Independence are still
debated. There are some who have the hardihood to deny them. Here I
venture to bespeak from you the simple loyalty of those whose places
you occupy. Should an evil hour arrive, when these ideas and promises
are in peril, then let them find a breastwork, not in your hills, but
in your hearts. And may the rally extend until it embraces the whole
country, and the Revolution begun by our fathers is completed by the
establishment of all the rights of all!
POWERS OF THE TWO HOUSES OF CONGRESS IN THE ABSENCE OF A QUORUM.
PROTEST IN THE SENATE, AT ITS OPENING, JULY 3, 1867.
July 3d, according to the provision in the resolution of
adjournment at the last session, Congress met at noon this day.
The Chief Clerk read the resolution.[228] Mr. Sumner then said
that he rose to a question of order on the resolution.
The resolution under which Congress is to-day assembled, so far as it
undertakes to direct the adjournment of the two Houses of Congress
without day, in the absence of a quorum of the two Houses, is
unconstitutional and inoperative, inasmuch as the Constitution, after
declaring that “a majority of each House shall constitute a quorum to
do business,” proceeds to provide that “a smaller number may adjourn
from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of
absent members”; and therefore such resolution must not be regarded
by the Chair, so far as it undertakes to provide for an adjournment
without day.
As, according to the view, there is a quorum already present, the
incident contemplated by the resolution will not arise; but I felt it
my duty, by way of precaution and _caveat_, to introduce this protest,
to the end that the resolution may not hereafter be drawn into a
precedent so as to abridge the rights of the two Houses of Congress
under the Constitution of the United States.
Mr. Trumbull, of Illinois, differed from Mr. Sumner, and
entered his “protest against any such construction of the
Constitution as denies to the two Houses of Congress the right
to regulate their own adjournments.” After quoting the text of
the Constitution, that “a majority of each shall constitute a
quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from
day to day and may be authorized to compel the attendance of
absent members,” Mr. Sumner said:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account