Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 15 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 15 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
I mean that important treaty by which the Emperor of Russia has
ceded to the United States all his possessions on the North American
continent. The ratifications were exchanged only about a fortnight
ago. Yesterday, the 4th of July, I was honored by a visit from the
Minister of Russia, who put into my hand a cable despatch from St.
Petersburg, announcing that on the day before the Russian Commissioner
left St. Petersburg for Washington to make the formal surrender of that
vast region to the United States. To my inquiry when the Commissioner
would arrive the Minister replied, “In a fortnight.” In a fortnight,
then, final proceedings will be had for the establishment of your
jurisdiction over that region, and two questions arise: first, our
duty to complete the contract, in consideration of the cession, to
pay $7,200,000; and, secondly, our other duty to provide a proper
government. But the proposition of my friend from Rhode Island would
exclude these important topics from our consideration.
MR. ANTHONY. Would the Senator have the Senate originate an
appropriation bill?
MR. SUMNER. I would have the Senate originate a bill for the
government of this territory, and, if need be, originate a bill
for the payment of the money due. There is no objection in the
Constitution.
MR. ANTHONY. It has never been done.
MR. SUMNER. I beg the Senator’s pardon; it has been done again
and again.
MR. ANTHONY. An appropriation bill originated in the Senate?
MR. SUMNER. Oh, yes.
MR. ANTHONY. I never knew that to be done but once; and then
the House rejected it, refused to consider it.
MR. SUMNER. The Senator refers to what are called the general
appropriation bills. The Senate constantly makes appropriations for
individual cases and for carrying out treaties. Does it not appropriate
for private claims, for salaries, for other obligations? In principle,
the present case does not differ from an appropriation for an estate
adjoining the Capitol. Alaska is not an estate adjoining the Capitol;
but it is to be paid for.
That I may make this clearer, I call attention to the very words of the
treaty with Russia:--
“His Majesty the Emperor of all the Russias shall appoint
with convenient despatch an agent or agents for the purpose
of formally delivering to a similar agent or agents appointed
on behalf of the United States the territory, dominion,
property, dependencies, and appurtenances which are ceded as
above, and for doing any other act which may be necessary in
regard thereto. But the cession, with the right of immediate
possession, is nevertheless to be deemed complete and absolute
on the exchange of ratifications, without waiting for such
formal delivery.”[230]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account