Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 17 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 17 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
January 12th, Mr. Sumner presented a memorial from citizens of
Virginia then in Washington, claiming to represent the loyal
people of that State, in which they declare themselves “anxious
for the prompt admission of the State to representation upon
such terms that a loyal civil government may be maintained
and the rights of loyal men secured; which,” they say, “we
feel assured cannot be the case, if any condition less
than the application of the test oath to the Legislature
shall be imposed by the Congress.” As the grounds of this
conviction, they point, among other matters, to the continued
manifestations of the Rebel spirit in the community,--the
ascendency of the Rebel party in the recently elected
Legislature, gained, as they insist, “by intimidation, fraud,
violence, and prevention of free speech,”--and particularly
to the evidences of disloyalty, and of meditated bad faith
in regard to the new State Constitution, exhibited in
speeches and other utterances of the Governor and Members of
Assembly,--utterances, on the part of some of the latter,
accompanied with gross contumely of a distinguished Member of
Congress from Massachusetts: all of which, the memorialists
say, “if a hearing can now be had, and which we respectfully
request may be granted, we pledge ourselves to show by sworn
witnesses of irreproachable character, residing in Virginia.”
The memorial was received with denunciation, as
“disrespectful,” “unjust and abusive,” “merely the wailing
of those who were defeated,” “originating with the view of
keeping out Virginia,” “trifling with our own plighted faith
and honor,”--and its presentation criticized with corresponding
severity,--the Senators from Nevada leading the assault. Mr.
Sumner responded:--
MR. PRESIDENT,--Has it come to this, that the loyal people of Virginia
cannot be heard on this floor? that a petition presented by a member
of this body, proceeding from them, is to have first the denunciation
of the Senator from Nevada on my right [Mr. NYE], and then the
denunciation of the Senator from Nevada on my left [Mr. STEWART]?
Why are the loyal people of Virginia to be thus exposed? What have
they done? Sir, in what respect is that petition open to exception?
The Senator says it is disrespectful. To whom? To this body? To the
other Chamber? To the President of the United States? To any branch of
this Government? Not in the least. It is disrespectful, according to
the Senator from Nevada, to the present Governor of Virginia, and he
undertakes to state his case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account