Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 17 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 17 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
Our country’s cause for which Greene contended was National
Independence. Our country’s cause recently triumphant in bloodiest
war was Liberty and Equality, the declared heritage of all mankind.
The first war was for separation from the mother country, according
to the terms of the Declaration, “That these United Colonies are and
of right ought to be Free and Independent States,”--the object being
elevated by the great principles announced. The second war was for
the establishment of these great principles, without which republican
government is a name and nothing more. But both were for country. The
larger masses, with the larger scale of military operations, in the
latter may eclipse the earlier; and it is impossible not to see that a
war for Liberty and Equality, making the promises of the Declaration a
reality, and giving to mankind an irresistible example, is loftier in
character than a war for separation. If hereafter Greene finds rivals
near his statue, they will be those who represented our country’s cause
in its later peril and its larger triumph. Just in proportion as ideas
are involved is conflict elevated, especially if those ideas concern
the Equal Rights of All.
Greene died at the South, and nobody knows the place of his burial. He
lies without epitaph or tombstone. To-day a grateful country writes his
epitaph and gives him a monument in the Capitol.
PERSONAL RECORD ON RECONSTRUCTION WITH COLORED SUFFRAGE.
REMARKS IN THE SENATE, JANUARY 21 AND FEBRUARY 10, 1870.
The arraignment of Mr. Sumner by Mr. Trumbull, of Illinois,
in the closing debate on the Virginia Bill, January 21st,
included, as remarked in that connection,[228] a reference
to matters of earlier date,--specifically among these being
the Reconstruction Act of March 2, 1867, conferring upon the
colored people of the Rebel States equality of suffrage with
the whites.[229] Adverting to the fact that this bill was an
amendment in the nature of a substitute for one from the House,
and then reading the names of the Senators who voted for it,
Mr. Trumbull asked,--
“Mr. President, do you miss the name of any Senator from
that list of Yeas?--That was the vote by which that
amendment was adopted.--The ‘Absent’ were, among others,
‘Mr. Sumner.’”
And upon this showing, Mr. Trumbull concluded, that,
“Unfortunately the colored citizens of the South have
nothing to thank the Senator from Massachusetts for, in
having the right of suffrage conferred upon them.”
Mr. Trumbull continued:--
“Mr. President, this was not the only vote. A vote was
taken, after this amendment was adopted, upon the passage
of the bill thus amended; and the vote on the passage of
the bill was Yeas 29, Nays 10, and among those Yeas is not
found the name of the Senator from Massachusetts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account