Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“Mr. Sumner asked, and by unanimous consent obtained, leave to
bring in a bill supplementary to an Act entitled ‘An Act to protect
all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and furnish
the means of their vindication,’ passed April 9, 1866; which was
read the first and second times, by unanimous consent, referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary, and ordered to be printed.”
The next appearance of the bill is July 7th, of that year, when,
according to the Journal, “Mr. Trumbull, from the Committee on the
Judiciary,” with a large number of other bills reported this to the
Senate, with a recommendation “that they ought not to pass.” The record
says that--
“The Senate proceeded to consider the said bills as in Committee
of the Whole; and no amendment being made, they were severally
reported to the Senate.
“On motion by Mr. Trumbull,
“_Ordered_, That the said bills be postponed indefinitely.”
You will observe, Sir, the bill was treated in the lump with others,
at the close of the session; and you have here the report of the very
committee to which it is now proposed to refer it.
The next appearance of the bill is January 20, 1871, and the entry is
as follows:--
“Mr. Sumner asked, and by unanimous consent obtained, leave to
bring in a bill supplementary to an Act entitled ‘An Act to protect
all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and furnish
the means of their vindication,’ passed April 9, 1866; which was
read the first and second times, by unanimous consent, referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary, and ordered to be printed.”
February 15, 1871, “Mr. Trumbull, from the Committee on the Judiciary,
to whom were referred the following bills [the present with others],
reported them severally without amendment, and that they ought not to
pass.”
There was no action of the Senate at the time; for you will bear in
mind the lateness of the day in the session; and Senators cannot have
forgotten the pressure of business at that time. That was sufficient
reason against the consideration of the bill. Indeed, with all the
assiduity that I could command, I was not able to obtain a hearing for
it.
Then came the first session of the Forty-Second Congress, beginning
March 4, 1871. Upon the Journal it appears, March 9, 1871,--
“Mr. Sumner asked, and by unanimous consent obtained, leave to
bring in [this same bill, with one other], which were read the
first and second times, by unanimous consent, and ordered to lie on
the table and be printed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account