CASTERS.
Ordinary Queen Anne examples bring 50s. to 60s. per oz.; George I
and George II, 25s. to 35s. per oz.; George III and George IV, 18s.
to 20s. per oz. Later specimens only fetch 5s. to 12s. per oz.
Rare and earlier examples bring higher prices, e.g.:
£
William and Mary (1701), 225s. per oz. 112
Queen Anne (2), (1713), 115s. per oz. 72
SUGAR-BOWLS.
The average prices are roughly as follows: George I, 60s. to 80s.
per oz.; George II, 20s. to 50s. per oz.; George III, 8s. to 50s.
per oz. (varying from engraved and fluted to pierced and applied
ornament); George IV, 7s. (fluted) to 35s. per oz. (pierced and
applied ornament); William IV, 6s. to 20s. per oz.
Exceptional pieces of course bring exceptional prices. A
sugar-basket of 1725, by Paul Lamerie, sold in 1909 for £113, at
195s. per oz. A set of three George III (1763) sugar vases and
covers were sold at the Ashburnham Sale in March 1914, for £214, at
135s. per oz.
X
THE
CREAM-JUG
[Illustration: GEORGE II HELMET-SHAPED JUG. LONDON, 1736.
Maker, Paul de Lamerie.
(_By courtesy of Messrs. Crichton Brothers._)]
CHAPTER X
THE CREAM-JUG
The eighteenth-century tea-table and its accessories--The beauty of
the cream-jug--Its evolution in form during a century.
“I must further advise you, Harriet,” says a lady in the _Fool of
Quality_, in admonishing her daughter, “not to heap such mountains of
sugar into your tea, nor to pour such a deluge of cream in; people will
certainly take you for the daughter of a dairymaid. There is young
Fanny Quirp, who is a lady by birth, and she has brought herself to the
perfection of never suffering the tincture of her tea to be spoilt by
whitening, nor the flavour to be adulterated by a grain of sweet.” This
was published from 1766 to 1770 and indicates that a set of rules for
observance was afoot in a time when etiquette was formal.
But if cream was neglected by some precisians, the cream-jug bears
evidence that in many circles it was a welcome and possibly very
necessary addition to the strong green tea then drunk.
It was etiquette to place the spoon in the cup to show the hostess that
no more tea was required. It was the custom at Scottish tea-tables and
possibly elsewhere to have numbered spoons. The guests did not ask
for a second cup until all the other guests had finished the first.
Hence the cups were passed up to the hostess and the spoons numbered to
ensure that each got his own again.
Sir Alexander Boswell in his poem “Edinburgh” writes:
The red stone teapot with its silver spout,
The teaspoons numbered and the tea filled out;
Though patience fails, and though with thirst he burns,
All, all must wait till the last cup returns.
The silver strainer had apparently become obsolete in Sir Walter
Scott’s day, for he writes in _St. Ronan’s Well_:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account