Chlorinating agents (chlorine, sulfur dichloride, etc.) rapidly
transform mustard gas into an inactive (non-blistering) substance.
Sulfur dichloride was a valuable reagent in both laboratory and works
in “cleaning up” mustard gas. This reaction also explains why the
early attempts to prepare mustard gas by the interaction of ethylene
and sulfur dichloride were unsuccessful. Mustard gas is probably
formed, but is almost immediately chlorinated by the excess of sulfur
dichloride. Sulfur chloride on the other hand has no effect on mustard
gas. Chloramine-T and Dichloramine-T (the valuable therapeutic agents
introduced by Dakin and Carrel for treatment of wounds) also react
with mustard gas. For this reason they were advocated as treatment for
mustard gas burns. But as we will see later, they were not altogether
successful.
DETECTION
At first the only method of detecting mustard gas was through the sense
of smell. It was then believed that concentrations which could not be
detected in this way were harmless. Later this proved not to be the
case, and more delicate methods had to be devised. In the laboratory
and in the field these tests were not very satisfactory, because most
of them depended upon the presence of chlorine, and the majority of the
war gases contained chlorine or one of the other halogens. The Lantern
Test depended upon the accumulation of the halogen upon a copper
gauze and the subsequent heating of the gauze in a Bunsen flame. This
test could be made to detect one part of mustard gas in ten million
parts of air. Another field detector devised by the Chemical Warfare
Service consisted in the use of selenious acid. Here again the lack of
specificity is apparent, for while certain halogen compounds did not
give the test, arsine and organic arsenicals gave a positive reaction
and often in a shorter time than mustard gas.
[Illustration: FIG. 36.—Field Detector for Mustard Gas.]
The Germans are said to have had plates covered with a yellow
composition which had the property of turning black in the presence
of mustard gas. These plates were lowered into the bottom of recently
captured trenches and if, after a few minutes, they turned black, the
presence of mustard gas was suspected. It is also stated that the
characteristic yellow paint on the olive of the mustard gas shell
had the same composition, and was useful in detecting leaky shell.
According to a deserter’s statement, however, reliance upon this test
resulted in casualties in several instances.
A white paint has also been reported which turned red in the presence
of mustard gas. This color change was not characteristic, for tests
made by our Army showed that other oils (aniline, turpentine, linseed)
were found to produce the same effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account