A preliminary study of the situation indicated that any filter for fine
smoke particles must have a high resistance per unit of area, but that
the total resistance must be comparatively low. In order to secure
the large area necessary to bring the total resistance within reason,
the experimental work was developed along three lines: The formation
of a filter into a bag, cup, or jacket to surround the outside of
the canister; the use of an arrangement sufficiently compact to go
inside the canister; and the use of a filter as a separate unit, to be
attached to the canister by an air connection.
A survey of the possible filtering materials indicated that only two
offered promise, namely, paper and felt.
PAPER FILTERS
Reports that the British had developed thin, creped, sulfite-cellulose
wood pulp paper for filters led to an intensive study of this material
by the Chemical Warfare Service.
[Illustration: FIG. 104.—Crepe Paper Doughnut Filter Canister.]
In general we may say that the development of paper filters (in sheet
form) met with little success. Papers affording the required protection
did not live up to the resistance specifications. The reason for this
probably is in the method of making paper. The pulp is fed onto the
screen of a Fourdrinier machine under conditions that do not permit of
uniformity in the distribution of the fibers and consequently there is
no uniformity in the size of pores. In order to eliminate the large
holes, which allow the smoke to pass readily, the paper must be pressed
to reduce these pores to the proper magnitude. This naturally results
in an approximately equal decrease in the size of the small pores, with
a consequent increase in the final resistance out of all proportion to
the protection gained. A very satisfactory paper was finally produced,
but the resistance was too high and it was necessary to increase the
total available filtering area, which resulted in the accordion type
of filter. This filter was incapable of development on a large scale
because of the large amount of hand work required in assembling. The
lack of uniformity in a single sheet has been overcome with some
success by making up a filter from 40 to 80 layers of tissue or crepe
paper, trusting that the law of chance would bring the large pores in
some successive layer. Such a filter was adopted by the British, but
since it did not give protection comparable with that afforded by felt
filters, it was rejected in the United States.
In the so-called “doughnut” filter use was made of tissue paper.
Instead of seeking for uniformity in a vertical direction through a
block of tissues, it was sought along the axis horizontal with the
sheet. The effectiveness of such a filter was less than that of felt.
In addition, serious difficulty was met in cutting the pile of tissue
paper into the proper shape so that eventually it was abandoned as a
production possibility.
FELT FILTERS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account