=Napoleon.= Napoleon achieved the same decisive power in a different
way. Realizing that his French troops could not stand the rigorous
training that the Prussians underwent, he trained them to fight with
great enthusiasm, to travel long distances with unheard of swiftness,
and to strike the enemy where least expected. He added to that a
concentration of artillery until then not thought of as possible on the
field of battle. He, of course, had also a genius for organizing and
keeping up his supply.
=Grant and Jackson.= Grant at Vicksburg and Stonewall Jackson in
the Shenandoah Valley and at Chancellorsville, achieved the same
results in different ways. In every case the fundamental principle of
concentrating the greatest force at the decisive point at the vital
moment in the battle remained the same. The methods for achieving that
end change with every age, and every commander of world-wide renown
developed something new or used an old method in a new way. And that
is the fundamental requirement for a successful general. Hannibal,
Hasdrubal, Cæsar, Napoleon, Frederick the Great, Scott, Grant, and
Jackson were all independent thinkers. Each and every one dared to
do something that every other general and statesman of his time told
him could not be done or that would bring about disaster. They had
the courage of their convictions. They had the courage to think out
new ideas and to develop them, and then they had the courage to carry
through those convictions, not alone against the opposition of the
enemy, but against the opposition of their own people, both in the
field and at home. And we may be perfectly sure that in each case had
these men not done the things they did, they would have gone down to
oblivion just as has been the case with millions of others who tried
the usual methods in the usual way.
=Chemical Warfare Latest Development.= Chemical Warfare is the latest
development of war. So far as the United States is concerned, it is
considerably less than four years old. It is the most scientific of all
methods of fighting and also the most universally applicable to all
other methods of making war. The use of poisonous and irritating gases
in war is just as fundamental as the introduction of gunpowder. In
fact, they have an even wider application to war than powder itself.
=Necessity for New Methods.= The idea that has been expressed above
is that the General Staff and the Army commander who sticks to old
and tried methods and who is unwilling to try with all his might new
developments, will never achieve any first class success. The General
Staffs and the generals of the future that win wars will be the ones
who make the most vigorous and efficient use of Chemical Warfare
materials. They cannot confine this use to the artillery, to Aviation,
to Special Gas Troops, or to any other single branch of the war
machine. They must make use of it in every way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account