=Efficiency of Artillery Gas Shell.= It is well to remember in the
beginning that all artillery shell so far designed and used, contain
only about 10 per cent gas, i.e., 10 per cent of the total weight of
shell and gas. It is hoped that gas shell may later be so designed
that a somewhat greater proportion of the total weight of the shell
will be gas than is now true. This is very desirable from the point of
efficiency. As stated above the bombs used by Chemical Warfare troops
contain nearly 50 per cent of their total weight in gas, and hence are
nearly five times as efficient as artillery shell within the limit of
range of these bombs. This fact alone is enough to warrant the use of
gas troops to their full maximum capacity in order that the artillery
may not fire gas at the ranges covered.
GUNS FIRING PERSISTENT AND NON-PERSISTENT GASES
Considering the firing of non-persistent and persistent gases, it may
be said generally that non-persistent gases will be fired only by the
medium caliber guns which are available in large numbers. In fact, the
firing of non-persistent gases will be confined mainly to the 6-inch or
155 mm. Howitzer and gun.
As our Army was organized in France, and as it is organized at present,
the number of 155 mm. guns will be greater than all others put
together, except the 75 mm. In order that a non-persistent gas may be
most effective a high concentration must be built up very quickly. This
necessitates the use of the largest caliber shell that are available
in large numbers. Of course, a certain percentage of the gas shell of
other calibers may consist of non-persistent gases in order to help out
the 155 mm. gun. This is in accordance with the present program for
loading gas shell and applies particularly to the 8-inch and 240 mm.
Howitzer.
=Few Ideally Persistent or Non-Persistent Gases.= Naturally there
will be very few gases that are ideally non-persistent or ideally
persistent. The groups will merge into one another. Those on the border
line will be arbitrarily assigned to one group or the other. It might
be said definitely, however, that a gas which will linger more than six
or possibly eight hours under any conditions, except great cold, will
not be considered non-persistent. For reasons of efficiency and economy
persistent gases will not be chosen unless they will persist under
ordinary conditions for two or three days or more. Accordingly, a gas
which would persist for one day only would have to be extraordinarily
useful to lead to its adoption.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account