Of the field guns in use, the 75 mm. will be best, up to the limit of
its range, for persistent gases such as mustard gas, and the tear gas,
bromobenzylcyanide. A considerable number, however, were filled with
non-persistent gases and probably will continue to be so, since, due to
the very large number of 75 mm. guns available, they can be used to add
greatly at times to the amount of non-persistent gas that can be fired
upon a given point.
USE OF GAS BY THE AVIATION SERVICE
No gas was used by aeroplanes in the World War. Many rumors were spread
during the latter part of the war to the effect that the Germans had
dropped gas here or there from aeroplanes. Every such report reaching
the Chemical Warfare Service Headquarters was run down and in every
case was found to be incorrect. However, there was absolutely no
reason for not so using gas, except that the German was afraid. In the
early days of the use of gas he did not have enough gas, nor had he
developed the use of aeroplanes to the point where it would have seemed
advisable. When, however, he had the aeroplanes the war had not only
begun to go against him, but he had become particularly fearful of gas
and of aeroplane bombing.
It does not seem to be generally known, but it is a fact, that after
three or four months’ propaganda he made a direct appeal to the Allies
to stop the use of gas sometime during the month of March, 1918. This
propaganda took the form of an appeal by a Professor of Chemistry who
had access to Switzerland, to prevent the annihilation of the Allied
forces by a German gas that was to make its appearance in 1918. This
German professor claimed that, while favoring the Germans winning the
war, he had too much human sympathy to desire to see the slaughter that
would be caused by the use of the new gas. The Allies in the field felt
that this was simply an expression of fear and that he did not have
such a gas. The Germans were accordingly informed that the Allies would
not give up the use of gas. Later events proved these conclusions to be
absolutely correct. The German evidently felt that the manufacturing
possibilities of the Allies would put them in a more predominant
position with gas than with anything else. In that he was exactly
correct.
The use of gas by aeroplanes will not differ from its use in artillery
or by Chemical Warfare Troops. Non-persistent gases may be dropped
on the field of battle, upon concentration points, in rest areas, or
other troop encampments to produce immediate casualties. Persistent
gases will be dropped particularly around cross-roads, railroad yards,
concentration points and encampments that cannot be reached by the
artillery. The sprinkling of persistent gases will be one of the best
ways for aeroplanes to distribute gas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account