However, within a comparatively short time after American troops got
into the front line it was realized that a second mask, inferior in
protection to the first, was highly undesirable. During a gas attack
men seemed to acquire an uncontrollable desire to shift from one
mask to the other. This shifting in nearly every case resulted in a
casualty. We then came rapidly to the conclusion that one mask only
should be furnished, and that one the best that could be made, and
then to impress upon the soldier the fact that his life depended upon
the care he took of his mask. This proved to be an entirely sound
conclusion, as the number of men gassed through injuries to the mask
was comparatively small. An interesting proof of the value the soldier
placed upon his mask was shown by the articles of equipment thrown away
by 10,000 British stragglers in the great German offensive of March,
1918. Of the articles thus thrown away the gas mask came at the foot of
the list, with only 800 missing. The steel helmet is said to have come
next with about 4,000 missing.
SIZES OF FACES FOR MASKS
When adopting the British respirator in August, 1917, it was decided
that the American face as well as the American stature was probably
larger than the English. Accordingly inquiry was made in regard to
the sizes of masks issued to the Canadians as it was thought probable
they required a greater proportion of the larger size masks than did
the English. When prescribing the relative quantities of each size
of mask to be furnished Americans, the Canadian requirements were
taken as a base but with the larger sizes increased slightly over the
Canadian requirements. As a matter of fact even these increases proved
considerably too small, so that the numbers in the two sizes above
normal had to be finally more than doubled.
OBJECTIONS TO GERMAN TYPE MASK
The American Gas Service felt from the beginning that a design which
attached the box of chemicals to the facepiece was unsound in principle
(this design was used in the German mask and in the French A. R. S.
masks), since it did not allow proper flexibility for increasing the
size of the box to care for new gases. Furthermore, the weight of the
box during movement caused the facepiece to swing slightly from side
to side. This interfered with vision and tended to lift the facepiece
away from the face and allow gas to enter. That the objections of
the American Gas Service to this type were correct was proved by the
difficulty encountered toward the end of the war by both the French
and the Germans in trying to provide a suitable filter for protection
against particulate clouds and the smokes, such as stannic chloride and
diphenylchloroarsine.
STRUGGLE BETWEEN MASK AND GAS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account