Chicago and its cess-pools of infamyWilson, Samuel Paynter
History
Chicago and its cess-pools of infamy
Wilson, Samuel Paynter
Chicago (Ill.) -- Social conditions; Prostitution -- Illinois -- Chicago
All sorts of people seek the assistance of the divorce lawyers to
free them from their matrimonial ties. Extravagant and reckless wives
of men who are not able to meet their demands for money; dissolute
actresses, who wish to break up an old alliance in order to form a new
one; married women who have become infatuated with some scamp they
have met at the theatre matinee, or through the medium of a personal;
married men who are tired of their wives and desire to be united to a
new partner; lovers of married women, who come to engage fabricated
testimony and surreptitious divorce for the frail creatures whose
virtue is still too cowardly to dare the more honest sin; all who, with
or without protest, seek a release from the married bond. For each
and all the divorce lawyer has a ready ear and an encouraging word.
Nothing is easier than to obtain a divorce, he assures them. If the
cause assigned by them is insufficient, it can be made strong enough;
if evidence is lacking, it can be obtained—manufactured, if necessary.
He receives a retainer from each, and all, and sends them away with the
happy consciousness that their matrimonial troubles will soon be over.
A divorce costs anywhere from twenty-five dollars to whatever sum the
applicant is willing to pay for it, and can be obtained in Chicago,
or in any state, according to the wishes of the party and the desire
to avoid publicity. Any cause may be assigned; the lawyer in a great
many instances guarantees that the evidence to support it shall be
forthcoming at the proper time. It is a little more troublesome to
obtain a Chicago divorce, than in some states, but the machinery of
the law is sufficiently loose even there to enable a well-managed case
to be successful. The divorce lawyer has witnesses upon whom he can
depend, some of them are regularly in his pay. They will swear as they
are instructed. The proceedings are often private, the courts using
their private chambers for the hearing, and are no doubt frequently in
collusion with the lawyer conducting the case. Even the newspapers fail
to record the occurrence. The defendant has been kept in ignorance of
the proceedings, and naturally does not appear in court in person or by
counsel to offer any opposition and the case goes by default. The judge
hears the evidence, which has been carefully prepared, in the case;
submits a decision in favor of the plaintiff; and the first thing the
defendant knows is a dissolution of the marriage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account