Chicago and its cess-pools of infamyWilson, Samuel Paynter
History
Chicago and its cess-pools of infamy
Wilson, Samuel Paynter
Chicago (Ill.) -- Social conditions; Prostitution -- Illinois -- Chicago
“You understand, of course, that society is not happy in all its
honors. All the brownstone houses have to have closets put in every
year in order to accommodate the skeletons. Still, many a woman and
man, if let alone, would bear his or her connubial burdens meekly,
rather than to face the scandal and publicity of a divorce trial. Our
special divorce lawyers know this, and so they invade society. They
transfer the base of operations to the drawing rooms. How? By using
swell members of the fashionable world to first find out where there is
a canker in the case, and then to deftly set forth, in a perfect way,
how divorce is the only cure.” Nine-tenths of this delicate business@
is employed in pursuing hesitating wives. Husbands could hardly be
approached in their own homes with a proposition to break them up. Take
an impressionable woman, already unhappy, who has once been thinking of
divorce, and the case is different. She is clay for the moulder. The
serpent whispers how nice it will be to bank her alimony, tells her
lies about the old man, induces her to believe that the firm down-town
will put in no bill if they don’t succeed, and so the affair is
arranged.
For this despicable service the “agent” receives ten per cent of the
fee paid the divorce lawyer by the wife, which fee, be it remembered,
comes out of the husband’s pocket.
Oftentimes the “agent” is called upon to personate the husband,
especially in serving the summons of the court upon him. The lawyer in
charge has the case quietly put on record in the proper court, and has
a summons prepared for service upon the defendant. A boy is called in
from the street, anybody will answer, and is paid a trifle to take the
summons to the defendant’s place of business or residence, and deliver
it to him in person. Arriving at his destination, the boy is met by
the “agent” of the divorce lawyer, at the door or on the steps. The
agent sharply demands his business, and is answered by the boy that he
wishes to deliver a paper to Mr. X—. “I am Mr. X—.” The boy in perfect
good faith, for he has never seen Mr. X— in his life, delivers the
summons upon the defendant in person. He is then dismissed, and plays
no further part in the case. His affidavit is sufficient for this part
of the proceedings, and the shameful mockery of justice proceeds to
another stage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account