Opinion is very much divided as to the effect of opium on those who
indulge in it. When I was in Indo-China I was only able to consult English
doctors on the subject, and it was impossible not to feel that they were
necessarily prejudiced in favour of the drug, bearing in mind the great
revenues reaped by their Government from its importation. I was assured by
one of them that its use in moderation was perfectly harmless, and that
an old confirmed smoker if suddenly deprived of it, does not suffer any
ill effects. This, by the way, is a very important point. My informants
cited cases of ardent consumers of opium being thrown into prison, where
such a thing as a pipe was not to be had; yet instead of suffering from
the deprivation, the victims retained their usual health, and were not
nearly so much affected as sailors would be who could not have the tobacco
to which they are accustomed, or drunkards cut off from every beverage
but pure water. It will be remembered that after the suppression of the
Commune in France in 1871, many of the insurgents sent to Brest died at
once from the sudden loss of the stimulants they had become accustomed
to. More hardened or more philosophical, who shall say which? the Chinese
prisoners deprived of their best-beloved pastime resign themselves without
a murmur, though there is no doubt that they suffer frightfully from the
terrible conditions in the gaols, coming out, if they come out alive, mere
skeletons. A "Celestial" place of detention is indeed a Gehenna of horror
and misery. It is only fair to add, however, that a case occurred of a
man, who before he was sent to prison had never missed his pipe for thirty
years, yet he gained three pounds in weight during the first three weeks
of his detention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account