Freight rates and tariffs are in some places as powerful as battleships
and battalions in keeping out the commerce of a rival. When Japan and
Russia rejected America’s proposition for an international control
of Manchurian railways, so that the commerce of all nations would
pay the same duty and receive the same car supply in Manchuria,
Japan and Russia made a secret treaty regarding Manchuria on July 4,
1910, and another agreement in 1912. Among other points, it covered
interchange rates. The Russian railways can by high rates keep out
competitive Japanese goods, and the Japanese railways can retaliate.
On non-competitive goods needed for local consumption, low through
rates are accorded, Japan favoring the famous Harbin flour, timber,
kaoliang spirits from the Harbin distilleries, and Amur salmon and
fish. Russia accords low rates northward to Japanese (i. e., Fushun
and Yentai) coal, cement, fresh food, etc. On export competitive
soybeans, for instance, by low rates Japan tries to coax Russian
shipments southward via Dairen, and Russia makes a similar effort to
route Japanese-controlled beans via Vladivostok, but should a Russian
shipper try to send ten miles in the direction of Japanese-owned Dairen
he would find the soy rate higher than all the five hundred miles to
Vladivostok.
By indirect methods, such as loans at low interest, rebated godown
charges, rebated rates, and what not (for where there’s a will there’s
a way) Japan can militate against the competition of American and
British cottons, woolens, machinery, etc., in Manchuria. When the
Chinese junks on the Liao River compete in the open season for the
soy-bean traffic for Newchwang, the Japanese railways quote as low
a rate as five mills per ton mile to Dalny, as compared with the
lowest rate in America of eight mills. Japan is a David when she
goes out to slay! Japan was the whole cause of the denial by China
of an American-financed and constructed railway from Chin Wang Tao
through Manchuria northward to Aigun. Yet she says she doesn’t mean
to stay in Manchuria! She did not broad-gage Kuroki’s difficult
Antung-Mukden railway recently in such a permanent way as to suggest
that she ever intended to retire or sell out, “treaties and conventions
notwithstanding,” to use the apt phrase of the London _Times_. Though
America would under no circumstances accept a square foot of land in
China or Manchuria, except on lease in an international municipal
settlement, America must protect her growing and potential trade in
Manchuria and in China, and that trade will always be withstood in one
way or another by Japan. There is nothing now to go to war about, but
there will always be a good deal to argue about, and Japan, as well
as the Manchus, knows a dozen ways of presenting a smiling evasion.
Have you ever proposed a difficult question to a Japanese at a curio
auction, and watched his face! We have all voted that he was a success
in making language hide thought; a born diplomat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account