Moreover, the Manchu in his long rule at Peking debased the idea of
government by women and eunuch favorites. No one concerned will ever
forget the power of the notorious eunuch Li Lien Ying at Peking in the
years which led to the coup d’état of 1898, when reformers and emperor
were crushed to the ground. This notorious “grafter” really shared the
throne power with the Dowager Tse Hsi, and the Emperor Kwang Hsu was in
continual disgrace. The Manchus knew that it was unconstitutional to
honor eunuchs. During the minority of Kang-Hi, the greatest emperor of
the Manchus, the regents degraded the eunuchs and had the law engraved
on iron plates of one thousand pounds each. Why did not Tse Hsi observe
this law during her long regency? Did she think the people would not
remember and that her successor, Prince Chun, and the dynasty would
not suffer? Because of her hospitality when at the close of her life
she permitted her portrait to be painted for the St. Louis Exposition
by a talented American woman, and when she entertained several of the
charming legation ladies at Peking, books have been written by her
guests, in their womanly kindness of heart, and one book by a talented
editor friend of mine at Hongkong, palliating her offenses as a tyrant,
a reactionary and a murderess. The long cold history of British and
American diplomacy; the domestic history of China during her period,
the Boxer siege, the written testimony of the Emperor Kwang Hsu, her
“dummy” policy, the experiences of the great reformers, including
Yuan; her persecution over the whole world of Kang Yu Wei and Sun Yat
Sen by her spy system; the national newspapers, the publications of
Ching-Shan, her household controller; the statements of the American
secretaries of her chief viceroy, Li Hung Chang; the republican
revolution and Declaration of Independence of 1911, are all insistent
that egotism and reaction sat closest to the heart of this powerful
woman; that she belonged to the class of Catherine and not to the class
of Elizabeth or Victoria. If this was the character for seventy years
of the leader of the Manchus, what was the character of the followers!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account