China's Revolution, 1911-1912: A Historical and Political Record of the Civil WarDingle, Edwin John
History
China's Revolution, 1911-1912: A Historical and Political Record of the Civil War
Dingle, Edwin John
China -- History -- Revolution, 1911-1912
For the first time since the beginning of the revolutionary movement
in China the Imperialist cause had scored an undeniable success,
always excepting the savage burning of Hankow. The success of the
Imperialists was rightly ascribed to their superior equipment and
discipline, and that their loyalty to Peking, as well as their
efficiency, had stood the supreme test of battle was in itself an
event of first-rate importance. The strong feeling which has grown
up almost all over China against the Manchu had still to be reckoned
with. At this time it was an amusing diversion to read the opinions
being printed in the home Press. After referring to the feeling
among the proletariat against the Manchus, a writer in an editorial
in the London _Times_ said that "again a middle {134} term may
conceivably be found in the suggestion that, as an alternative to the
withdrawal of the Court from Peking, the present Regent should resign
his office into the hands of a Chinese Regent or Council of Regency.
The singular ceremony which took place a few days ago in Peking, when
the Regent, in the name of the infant Emperor, made atonement before
the 'heavenly spirits' of the Imperial ancestors for the
responsibility which he has to bear in the present troubles, may be
taken as something more than a mere formal acknowledgment of the
gravity of the crisis. In the solemn oath of allegiance to the new
constitutional regime taken by the Regent, there is, in so many
words, an admission that the Dynasty is in danger; and so grave an
admission is, we imagine, at least as unprecedented as the
circumstances which have provoked it. If it truly represents the
chastened spirit of the rulers of China, it can hardly fail to make a
deep impression upon the masses of the Chinese people, whose
traditional reverence for the Throne as a sacred {135} institution
dates back to time immemorial, and has survived numberless
revolutions in the past which, however disastrous to the occupants
for the time being of the Throne, never permanently affected its
inherent prestige."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account