Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
That it continued to be made after the Sung period is practically certain,
and there are specimens which one would unhesitatingly regard as Ming or
Yüan from their form. But, on the other hand, the prevailing shapes are
of the Sung kind, and we have very little to guide us in dealing with the
various Chün types except the form and the quality of the ware. The "soft
Chün" was very closely imitated at Yi-hsing on a yellowish body which
resembles the original in colour, but is generally harder, with a thick
unctuous glaze of somewhat crystalline texture and a turquoise lavender
colour, with rather thin and feeble patches of dull crimson, which lack
the spontaneous appearance of the originals. These Yi-hsing copies are
often marked with an incised numeral like the Canton Chün.
With regard to the duration of the Chün Chou factories, the standard
Chinese works on ceramics are curiously silent. They take no account of
the ware after the Sung period, and leave us to infer that it either
ceased to be made or ceased to be worthy of mention after that time. In
two places only have I found any hint of its survival in later times. One
is an incidental mention of Sung, Yuan, and Ming Chün wares in a modern
work,[276] and the other is in the pottery (not the porcelain) section
in the great K´ang Hsi Encyclopædia.[277] The latter passage is taken
from the administrative records of the Ming dynasty, and contains two
references to large supplies of vases (_p´ing_ and _t´an_) and wine jars
obtained from Chün Chou and Tz´ŭ Chou in the Hsüan Tê period (1426-1436)
and in the year 1553 of the Chia Ching period. We further learn that in
1563 an Imperial edict abolished both the tax which had previously been
levied on the Chün Chou wares and the subsidy which had to a great extent
counterbalanced the tax. These documents prove beyond doubt that potteries
of considerable size existed at Chün Chou in the Ming dynasty, though
their mention in this particular context seems to imply that the ware was
no longer ranked among the porcelains, and had apparently ceased to be
regarded as an artistic production.
From this time onwards to the present day the ceramic history of this
district is a blank, and we are unable to say whether the modern Yü Chou
pottery is a continuation or only a revival of the ancient art of the
place. A specimen of this modern ware in the Field Museum, Chicago, has
close affinities with the "soft Chün." Its base shows a buff stoneware
body washed over with dark brown clay, and the glaze is somewhat
opalescent though thinner than the old glaze, and its colour is a light
blue of a tint more grey than turquoise. Quantities of this modern Yü Chou
ware are to be found in Peking, and occasionally it is passed off as old
Chün, but no one with experience of the originals would be deceived by it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account