Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
But probably our safest clue to the appearance of Ju ware is to be found
in the important passage already mentioned,[105] in which a Sung writer
describes the Corean wares as in general appearance like the old _pi-sê_
ware of Yüeh Chou and the _new_ Ju Chou ware. The typical Corean wares of
this time are not uncommon, and their glaze--a soft grey green or greenish
grey, with a more or less obvious tinge of blue--would satisfy the Chinese
phrases, _tan ch´ing_ and _fên ch´ing_, and in the bluer specimens might,
by a stretch of poetic phrase, even be likened to the sky after rain.
The "egg white," however, must have been a somewhat paler tint if the
expression can be taken in any literal sense.
From the foregoing considerations we may conclude that the Ju porcelain
was a beautiful ware of celadon type, varying in tint from a very pale
green to a bluish green.
Though it is nowhere definitely stated how long the Ju Chou factories
retained their supremacy, it is tolerably clear from Hsü Ching's reference
in 1125, or very soon after, to the "modern porcelain of Ju Chou," that
they came into prominence towards the end of the Northern Sung period,
perhaps in the last half of the eleventh century; and as we have no
further information about them, we may perhaps infer that they sank into
obscurity when the Sung emperors were driven from the North of China by
the invading Tartars in 1127. In any case, the Ju ware seems to have
become as extinct as the Ch´ai by the end of the Ming dynasty. Hsiang
Yüan-p´ien, late in the sixteenth century, states that "Ju yao vessels are
disappearing. The very few which exist are almost all dishes, cups, and
the like, and many of these are damaged and imperfect."[106] A few years
later another writer[107] declares that the Ch´ai and Ju porcelains had
ceased to exist.
It is not to be supposed that Ju Chou had the monopoly of the particular
kind of _ch´ing_ ware in which its factories excelled. A number of other
and not distant potteries were engaged in a similar manufacture, though
with less conspicuous success. We read,[108] for instance, that "it was
made in the districts of T´ang, Têng, and Yao on the north of the (Yellow)
River, though the productions of Ju Chou were the best."
It has been already remarked that we possess no authenticated example
of Ju porcelain. Doubtless there are many pieces which are tentatively
assigned to Ju Chou by hopeful owners. But it must be confessed that the
few which have hitherto been published as such are singularly unfortunate
choices. Dr. B. Laufer, for instance, in his excellent work on jade,[109]
incidentally figures two vases for divining rods of a well-known form, of
which he hazards the remark "that both have presumably been made in the
kilns of Ju-chou."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account